1
   

IRAQ WEBLOG

 
 
Reply Thu 12 Sep, 2002 01:33 am
UNITED

NATIONS (CNN) -- U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan will tell Iraq on Thursday to stop defying the United Nations and allow

the return of weapons inspectors "for the sake of its own people and for the sake of world order."

"If Iraq's

defiance continues, the Security Council must face its responsibilities," Annan said in a draft of his speech to be delivered

Thursday to the 57th U.N. General Assembly.

But the secretary-general also had a message for the United States,

saying countries do have a right to self defense, but no U.N. member nation "large or small" should act alone on major global

issues as "a simple matter of political convenience."

"It has consequences far beyond the immediate context," he

said. "When states decide to use force to deal with broader threats to international peace and security, there is no

substitute for the unique legitimacy provided by the United Nations."

Annan's speech outlined what he called "four

current threats to world peace:" Iraq, the crisis in the Middle East, tensions between India and Pakistan, and the continued

instability in Afghanistan.

With much of the international community voicing opposition to military strikes on Iraq,

Annan said the "primary criterion for putting an issue" before the Security Council "should not be the receptiveness of the

parties, but the existence of a grave threat to world peace."

"The leadership of Iraq continues to defy mandatory

resolutions adopted by the Security Council," Annan said.

The secretary-general said he has "engaged Iraq in an

in-depth discussion on a range of issues," including the need for the return of weapons inspectors.

"Efforts to

obtain Iraq's compliance with the council's resolutions must continue," he said.

"I appeal to all who have

influence with Iraq's leaders to impress on them the vital importance of accepting the weapons inspections. This is the

indispensable first step towards assuring the world that all Iraq's weapons of mass destruction have indeed been eliminated.



"And let me stress towards the suspension and eventual ending of the sanctions that are causing so many hardships for

the Iraqi people. I urge Iraq to comply with its obligations for the sake of its own people and for the sake of world order."



The speech is to be delivered Thursday morning ahead of an address to the U.N. General Assembly by President Bush.

Security will be extremely tight, with at least six blocks around the building closed off. The United Nations described the

security as "at the highest level."

An FBI bulletin said there were no specific threats against the United Nations,

but "such an event in New York City within the general time frame of the first anniversary of the terrorist attacks of

September 11, 2001, represents a potentially attractive target for terrorists."

One senior U.N. official said the

United Nations took the unusual step of releasing Annan's speech to the press in advance because they were afraid the speech

would get overlooked by Bush's address.

This official said the primary message of the speech is that nations have a

right to self-defense, but "when it goes beyond that" -- when "broad threats" are at stake -- then the United Nations and

Security Council are there for that.

"This is a strong restatement of the multilateralist faith on which the U.N. is

based," this official said.

More highlights from the speech include:


Middle East: Annan said the United

Nations "must return to the search for a just and comprehensive solution" to the Middle East crisis. He said U.N. resolutions

have long spelled out the "ultimate shape" of a peace settlement: "land for peace; an end to terror and to occupation; two

states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side within secure and recognized borders."

"Both parties accept this

vision. But we can reach it only if we move rapidly and in parallel on all fronts. The so-called 'sequential' approach has

failed," Annan said.


Afghanistan: He urged "leaders of the international community to maintain your commitment to

Afghanistan." He welcomed new Afghan President Hamid Karzai to the assembly and said his country needs help in two primary

areas: Help to "extend its authority throughout the country" and the need for nations to "follow through on their commitment

to help with rehabilitation, reconstruction and development."

"Otherwise, the Afghan people will lose hope -- and

desperation, we know, breeds violence."


India-Pakistan tensions: He said the two South Asia nations recently came

"closer than for many years past to a direct conflict between two nuclear weapon capable countries." He thanked member states

for helping find an immediate solution, but said the international community may have a role to play should "a fresh crisis"

erupt.

"The situation may now have calmed a little, but it remains perilous," he said.




http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/09/11/annan.speech/
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,839 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
Anonymous
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Sep, 2002 01:41 am
Ayalon: U.S. won't ask

Israel to sit on sidelines in Ira
Ambassador to U.S. Danny Ayalon said Thursday that America has not asked Israel to sit

on the sidelines during any future assault on Iraq and he does not believe that any such request will be made.

"I do

not believe there will be an uneqouvical demand from the U.S. that Israel not participate in the attack. We will not take an

automatic actions - we will cooperate with the Americans," Ayalon said on Army Radio.

Asked if Israel received prior

warning that the U.S. would be moving its Central Command headquarters from Florida to Qatar, Ayalon said that "Israel can

rest assured that the Americans are keeping their promises. They are aware of our security needs."

Chief of Staff

Moshe Ya'alon, meanwhile, believes that the United States would prefer to see Israel not taking part in the planned attack

on Iraq.

"The Americans will be very happy if we are not involved," Ya'alon said Wednesday. "They want to do the

work alone, without anyone getting in the way."

Ya'alon, who was speaking during a memorial ceremony at the

Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya for the September 11 attacks in the United States, added that America was planning a

strike against "a non-conventional leadership that has non-conventional weapons." He described the Baghdad regime as "an

irresponsible regime that supports terror and is trying to achieve nuclear capability."

Ya'alon said that Iran would

be "next in line" on the Americans' list of priorities. However, in the Iranian case, there would not necessarily be a

military attack and Washington would first try to put diplomatic pressure on Tehran to change its policies or its government.



Ya'alon also warned of the possibility that one of the states hostile to Israel would try to equip a terror

organization with non-conventional weapons.

Also at the Herzliya conference, Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer

calmed fears about an impending American attack on Iraq. "There is no need for panic and hysteria in the face of [such] an

attack and an Iraqi attempt to retaliate against Israel," he said. "If the United States attacks and is able to overthrow

Saddam Hussein's regime, this will be a positive development for Israel. One should not overstate the Iraqi threat. True,

Baghdad has certain capabilities in the strategic sphere that could combine surface-to-surface missiles with chemical and

biological capabilities, but as far as can be assessed [with regard to the possibility of their being used against Israel],

the number of transport platforms - planes or missiles - is not big."

Ben-Eliezer said that he truly believed that

Israel "is prepared for the possibility of meeting an attack in the best way possible, better than at any other time... We

have the ability to respond independently, both defensively and offensively, to any scenario."

In a separate event,

Ya'alon said that after the Sept. 11 attacks, the United States now expresses more understanding for Israeli military moves

against the Palestinians. He noted that before daybreak Wednesday, dozens of IDF tanks "operated freely" in a Palestinian

town in Gaza, an incursion that drew no U.S. response, while a similar invasion the previous year had drawn a stiff

protest.

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=207641&contrassID=1&subContrassID=0&sbSubContrassI

D=0
0 Replies
 
Anonymous
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Sep, 2002 12:00 pm
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Sep, 2002 04:20 pm
0 Replies
 
Coolwhip
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Sep, 2007 07:43 am
Since when can 'guests' post 'ere?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » IRAQ WEBLOG
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/17/2024 at 06:12:05