@Holiday20310401,
Holiday20310401 wrote:Thanks boagie, I never thought of it that way. But are you saying that you do not exist if you don't experience anything? Are you saying that actuality has not potential, or am I making some assumption that is wrong?
Although I guess if there is no life then nothing exists right?
I don't understand. If you r what u experience then could it be said that experience causes identity.
Oh wait.. I see whats going on. I made the mistake when I only specified existence in a living sense only?:confused:
Existence is what gives potential and potential is what allows for experience?
Holiday:)
:)Life's a holiday on primrose lane, just kidding!! Glad to have you with us Holiday, a first and most interesting post, he is off and running. Well yes I do say it is a very good chance if you experience nothing, that you are dead. Actually in experiments involving sensory deprivation, when the subject is cut off from all stimulus, or it is taken down to a minimal and stretched over a lengthly period, the subject begins to self-destruct. It is my opinion that the concept of self should be greatly extended to include the concept of the physical world, the two are inseparable.
:)Actuality has limitations imposed by its forms, chaos is without form and so, is of greater potental. Experience does cause identity, but, it is experience of a given context which gives identity, the vitality of the individual is a given by nature, and in someways, may qualify or limit said life force's journey through its defining context. To be manifest, is to have taken on form, form itself is limitation in being, again, chaos is pure potential, because it is without form.