@MJA,
MJA;40445 wrote:Well then nameless One say something positive about a truth which is universal, a Truth that is both me and you like: God is One.
What "universal truth" needs me to 'make nice' to it? That would be ludicrous! Besides, 'this' universe is not divided into piles of 'positive' and 'negative', 'good' and 'bad/evil'. What is,
is!
I think that you would have a difficult time verifying/validating something as a "universal truth". You would have to make a proposition of a supposed "universal truth" and it would have to withstand the whirlwind unleashed against it. Ultimately, every person, every 'Perspective', human or otherwise, would have to agree with your assertion, for it to truly be 'universal'.
I might have stumbled on a couple, but it would take the 'duration of existence' to ever validate it's claim of universality. Until then, they are theories, hypothesis, assertions, experimental data, food for thought, lots of things, but there is no way to 'prove' anything, much less that something is a "universal truth".
For example;
One that I offered is;
"In Silentium, Verum!" - Book of Fudd (1:1)
"In Silence, Truth!"
(Things sound so much more... truthy... in Latin! *__- )
As soon as I offered it, 'argument' began, but none could 'dislodge' it's 'truthiness'. Even a 'universal truth' both is and isn't. It all depends on Perspective.
Here's another;
"For every Perspective, there's an equal and opposite Perspective!" - Book of Fudd (1:2)
Arguing the point just proves it!
Though this might seem as an undefeated universal truth to me, in 'this' universe, it might well not be seen thus by others. So it both is and isn't a 'universal truth'. Quantum 'phenomena'.
But i can offer "truths" these for scrutiny and dissection and critical examination and experiment and the longer they 'survive' the longer they survive. I cannot sell/push them as 'universal truths' other than by stating that they are 'universal' according to 'this' (my perceived) universe. I cannot describe your reality to you. That would be too arrogant. And would manifest howls of indignation.
I can offer them as food for thought and be here to answer questions and elucidate. If the respectful and honest questioning manages to refute something, fine. We forge ahead. It gets hot sometimes with many people 'attacking' an idea from many directions, but the hotter the fire, the truer the gold produced. The dross will burn off (from the concepts in your mind) and what is left will be 'truer' and elligible to progress onward rather than the scrap heap of critical thought. Perhaps the whole thing burns off. We all still benefit as one mor lie stripped from before our eyes.
"The Tao that can be spoken, is not the Tao!" -Lao Tsu
And is...
One cannot give 'truth' to another. One can lead and point in a direction that might work for you, but the seeker will have to find his own 'truths', within...
"He who dares to teach must never cease to learn." - Richard Henry Dann
"If a teacher is indeed wise, he does not bid you enter the house of his wisdom, but rather leads you to the threshold of your own mind." - Kahil Gibran
Peace