@EmperorNero,
EmperorNero;89563 wrote:I love the idea. Have experts write the articles instead of them being made up by I-pod kids and activists.
Just out of curiosity, would you be willing to take one of Wiki's "complete" articles (i.e. fully referenced) to show that it is inaccurate or biased?
I've got my reservations about any review material, whether Wikipedia or the Encyclopedia Brittanica, but when I look up subjects for which I have academic expertise (malaria, Lyme disease, HIV for instance) I find the articles to be accurate and up to date.
I think a competitor to Wikipedia will elevate the quality of both -- but I think Wikipedia is pretty good.