Reply
Fri 30 Apr, 2010 11:36 pm
April 30, 2010
(the 65th Anniversary of Hitler's SUICIDE with a Walther PPK 7.65mm pistol)
Fearful that America’s Supreme Court will soon strike down Chicago’s handgun ban,
frustrated by the Illinois legislature’s rejection of his anti-gun agenda,
and repudiated by American courts and legislatures over his plan to sue
federally licensed manufacturers and dealers of firearms for third-party crimes,
Chicago Mayor Richard Daley (D) is showing contempt for his own country’s
and state’s institutions, by seeking a foreign entity
to enforce his anti-gun agenda against the American people. [ Maybe he wants UN troops to enforce it?? David ]
This week, Daley called for “redress against the gun industry” in the World Court,
in The Hague, Netherlands. Forgetting or not caring who his constituents are, Daley blurted
“This is coming from international mayors. They’re saying, ‘We’re tired of your guns, America.’”
[Its his function to keep the international mayors energized?????? David]
Daley’s global gun control fantasy received the endorsement of
Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter (D), whose enthusiasm for
international law is apparently matched by his novel
interpretation of the United States Constitution. “I love the
Second Amendment,” Nutter recently said, but “I have a First
Amendment right not to be shot.” Nutter’s utterly ignorant
statement proves that in our country, you can be elected to
public office while knowing remarkably little about the Bill of Rights.
Nutter acknowledged that the Daley’s scheme is a “long shot.”
But, he said, “you never know until you try,” adding
“The political establishment in many state capitals"and certainly
in Washington [is] so deathly afraid of the NRA that people cannot
make the right decision for their own constituents.”
That’s not the only outrageous proposal put for forth by Chicago politicians of late.
Illinois State Representatives John Fritchey (D) and LaShawn Ford (D) have
decided that the best way to battle crime in “gun-free” Chicago is to militarize the city.
The two legislators recently called on Illinois Governor Pat Quinn (D), Mayor Daley,
and Chicago Police Superintendent Jody Weis to bring in the National Guard
in an effort to thwart crime.
So in a city that is quickly starting to sound more like a banana republic,
law-abiding citizens are denied the means to defend themselves,
while the best suggestion anti-gun lawmakers can come up with
to address crime is to emasculate the Chicago police department,
and bring in soldiers to occupy the city and patrol the streets!
It’s a sad day in America when lawmakers would rather turn to
National Guard patrols of city streets than to allow law-abiding citizens
the choice to legally own and carry firearms for self-defense.
From the NRA INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION
There appears to be an echo in here.
David despite your and the NRA pro gun propaganda The rest of the world wishes it known.
We’re tired of your guns, America!
@dadpad,
dadpad wrote:There appears to be an echo in here.
David despite your and the NRA pro gun propaganda The rest of the world wishes it known.
We’re tired of your guns, America!
That 's OK, dp; thay can be tired forever; no problem at all.
We
sincerely don 't care about aliens.
David
@OmSigDAVID,
I think the USA should allow long range artillery as under the protection of the constitution for those instances when long range armour piercing sniper rifles do not offer enough protection.
First, an off topic note: The ad for this page was from furniture and home accessories catalog Wisteria! So, somehow David's pro-gun rant was assigned an ad for a company that sells European and Asian hand crafts, antiques and antique reproductions, all in a funky to elegantly pretty mode! How funny!
Second, it is my impression that no one really knows how Hitler died. Or so the most widely spread story goes.
Third, your rant about guns has nothing to do with sovereignty! As dramatic as the use of that word is, it is just plain wrong.
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:I think the USA should allow long range artillery as under the protection of the constitution
for those instances when long range armour piercing sniper rifles do not offer enough protection.
Well, actually, the right to bear arms
was reserved to the citizens
NOT ONLY for self defense
from common criminals and animals, but also to overthrow the government
AGAIN,
if that proved to be necessary, as the Founders had just finished doing. Artillery can be helpful for that.
David
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:Second, it is my impression that no one really knows how Hitler died.
There are no historical ignoramuses around here, are there?
plainoldme wrote:Third, your rant about guns has nothing to do with sovereignty!
I am tempted to make an
ad hominem comment here, but I will restrain myself.
Suffice it to say that if the Mayor of Chicago wishes to overthrow
an interpretation of the Constitution by the USSC by his appeal to the "World Court"
that woud violate American sovereignty, if it happened.
Most people are intelligent enuf to see that.
plainoldme wrote:As dramatic as the use of that word is, it is just plain wrong.
Say goodnite, Gracie !
David
@OmSigDAVID,
As much as the FF's mistrusted the common man, I sincerely and seriously doubt they would have left wiggle room for an armed insurrection.
@OmSigDAVID,
Go do some reading on sovereignty. It is obviously a word you heard but never learned the definition of.
The Celts worshipped sovereignty as a goddess.
OmSigDavid says:
Quote: Well, actually, the right to bear arms
was reserved to the citizens NOT ONLY for self defense
from common criminals and animals, but also to overthrow the government AGAIN,
if that proved to be necessary, as the Founders had just finished doing.
You cllaim you adhere strictly to what the Constitution says, David. Can you show me where in the Constitution it says guns are for self-defense or to overthrow the government. Guns are reserved to the citizens FOR ONE PURPOSE ONLY, according to the Consitution--for the militia, WHICH WAS ORGANIZED AND DIRECTED BY GOVERNMENT, and took the place of a standing army in Colonial America, NOT for self-defense, NOT for overthrow. Read the Constitution again.
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
OmSigDavid says:
Quote: Well, actually, the right to bear arms
was reserved to the citizens NOT ONLY for self defense
from common criminals and animals, but also to overthrow the government AGAIN,
if that proved to be necessary, as the Founders had just finished doing.
You cllaim you adhere strictly to what the Constitution says, David. Can you show me where in the Constitution it says guns are for self-defense or to overthrow the government. Guns are reserved to the citizens FOR ONE PURPOSE ONLY, according to the Consitution--for the militia, WHICH WAS ORGANIZED AND DIRECTED BY GOVERNMENT, and took the place of a standing army in Colonial America, NOT for self-defense, NOT for overthrow. Read the Constitution again.
I 'll get back to u; gotta get some sleep.
David
David says:
Quote: I 'll get back to u; gotta get some sleep.
At 2:00 in the afternoon? You must be in worse shape than I thought.
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:Well, actually, the right to bear arms was reserved to the citizens NOT ONLY for self defense from common criminals and animals, but also to overthrow the government AGAIN, if that proved to be necessary, as the Founders had just finished doing.
No government organises its own overthrow. It was to have a cheap army if the British came back from Canada, or the French, or the Spanish...it was a big bad world and the USA was a tiny country.
@OmSigDAVID,
Gee, I thought everyone understood sovereignty . . . and Communism and communism . . . and socialism. I guess I give humanity too much credit.
@OmSigDAVID,
Monterey Jack is right on this one. This was well discussed about 10 years ago.
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
(the 65th Anniversary of Hitler's SUICIDE with a Walther PPK 7.65mm pistol)
Hitler was a gun-owner?
I learn something new in each of David's threads.
@plainoldme,
The exact cause and date of the death of Adolf Hitler has not been determined. A well known theory states that on 30 April 1945 Adolf Hitler committed suicide by gunshot[1] and cyanide poisoning. The lack of public information concerning the whereabouts of Hitler's remains, confused reports stemming from the dual method and other circumstances surrounding the event encouraged rumours that Hitler may have survived the end of World War II. Records kept by the Soviet KGB and Russian FSB were opened in 1992 and mostly matched the widely accepted version of Hitler's death as described by Hugh Trevor-Roper in his book The Last Days of Hitler, published in 1947.[2] However, the Russian archives yielded more detailed autopsy information along with what happened to the corpse.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace