@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
High Seas wrote:...what is the legal probability the court will finally agree with them, and - if they do - how will it affect the EU "stability" pacts?
Very small, I think, considering their last rulings.
You were right. The specter of systemic eurozone collapse has concentrated minds wonderfully. Even the UK, no euro fan, admits it:
Quote:"The winner of the fifth annual Financial Times ranking of European finance ministers, Germany’s Wolfgang Schäuble, could prove a controversial choice. Berlin’s tough stance at crucial moments in the past year often infuriated its neighbours. It delayed aid for Greece and scared financial markets by talking early on about private investors paying towards future bail-outs. On both occasions, its actions exacerbated eurozone difficulties. Mr Schäuble’s proposals for future eurozone governance included an “orderly insolvency mechanism”, anathema to Paris."
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5e0f8748-009f-11e0-aa29-00144feab49a.html#axzz17KFqbs80
NB bold added
PS am adding complete article text as FT database is subscription-only for most articles
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finance ministers: The vex factor
By Ralph Atkins in Frankfurt and Andrew Whiffin in London
Published: December 5 2010 19:22 | Last updated: December 5 2010 19:22
Europe’s top finance minister: Germany’s Wolfgang Schäuble
The television talent shows that draw in millions of viewers across Europe put contestants through a series of ordeals – exposure to the glare of international publicity, live performances in front of screaming audiences, and tests of skills and endurance.
They can hardly make relaxing Saturday night viewing for the continent’s finance ministers. A year of persistent and at times acute economic crises has posed uncomfortably similar challenges on an unprecedented scale for the men and women who control national purse strings.
Not only has Europe had to recover from the worst downturn since the second world war. It is no exaggeration to say that false steps by the ministers would have threatened the survival of the 16-nation monetary union, the emblem of economic integration. With budget plans, economic prospects, banking systems and their political effectiveness under relentless scrutiny, some ministers flopped. But some had the X factor – the mix of talent, judgment and luck needed for stellar performances and global fame.
The winner of the fifth annual Financial Times ranking of European finance ministers, Germany’s Wolfgang Schäuble, could prove a controversial choice. Berlin’s tough stance at crucial moments in the past year often infuriated its neighbours. It delayed aid for Greece and scared financial markets by talking early on about private investors paying towards future bail-outs. On both occasions, its actions exacerbated eurozone difficulties. Mr Schäuble’s proposals for future eurozone governance included an “orderly insolvency mechanism”, anathema to Paris.
However, the FT has ranked the ministers on a broad range of criteria. The strength of Germany’s rebound was one of the big surprises of 2010. Europe’s biggest economy is forecast to have grown by nearly 4 per cent in its best performance for two decades. That was not inevitable. Under Mr Schäuble, Berlin ran an expansionary fiscal policy this year, which helps explain a steep fall in unemployment. Contrary to popular perception, the discretionary fiscal stimulus was larger relative to the size of the economy than in most other EU countries.
But Mr Schäuble also put in place an exit strategy to bring public finances closer to balance; and nobody in financial markets questions Germany’s financial standing. The country “was very quick to decide on austerity measures, setting an example for the rest of Europe”, says Peter Vanden Houte at ING in Brussels and a member of the jury of economists that rated the contestants’ skills. Other German initiatives win praise. Jacques Delpla of France’s council of economic advisers describes Mr Schäuble as “bold and inventive” for putting in place a regime for dealing with failing German banks in future.
Methodology
The FT’s ranking of European finance ministers 2010 is based on a combination of three measures: political ability, economic performance and credibility in the markets. In each category, the 19 biggest European Union economies and their finance ministers received a ranking from one – the best – to 19. These were then combined to give an overall rank. The political aspect is based on the opinions of seven leading economists who judged the ministers on three criteria: their lucidity, or how well they understood events; their impact on the European stage; and their effectiveness at home. The economic ranking rests on five performance measures: recovery in terms of gross domestic product compared with the pre-crisis peak; deficit level for 2010 excluding fiscal stimulus; projected reduction in deficit by 2012; change in unemployment from 2007 to 2012; and, finally, deviation of the country’s current account from balance. Market credibility is judged by the current yield on outstanding 10-year bonds, as well as an assessment of how this yield has changed.
The contest produced other surprises. George Papaconstantinou of Greece is judged to have the best political skills of the 19 ministers ranked (some smaller EU nations and those outside the bloc were excluded). He showed panache in his handling of his country’s crisis. Marco Annunziata at Unicredit describes him as “remarkably effective at navigating treacherous EU politics, securing domestic acceptance of unprecedented austerity measures, and rebuilding some measure of investor confidence – almost impossible tasks.”
Erik Nielsen of Goldman Sachs adds: “I give him credit for working through the complex details and designing what was realistically the best attempt possible to address his country’s weaknesses through policy reforms.” Greece’s miserable performance leaves him in only eighth place overall but, if his economy begins to recover in 2011, Mr Papaconstantinou could emerge as next year’s star.
The UK’s George Osborne, a newcomer, also scores highly for his political skill in pushing through a bold fiscal austerity plan. Jacek Rostowski of Poland, who benefited from his country’s strong economic performance, ranks second. Last year’s winner, France’s Christine Lagarde, slips into third place. She wins praise for her skills as a mediator at European level, even if she was overshadowed at home by President Nicolas Sarkozy.
But there must also be losers. Some country’s problems simply proved too great to handle. Brian Lenihan was overwhelmed by the crisis in Ireland’s banking system and the implosion of the country’s economic growth.
Mr Lenihan could argue that an objective assessment of finance ministers is impossible: the impact of decisions taken now might not be seen for years; some events are beyond their control; economists fight over what is the best response to crises. But since when have talent shows been fair?
© Copyright The Financial Times Ltd 2010.