@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
You provide a single, dubious source describing a dubious result as though that underpins this dog and pony show you're trying to peddle here.
studies published in journals: results superior than placebo-3
"Treatment of Acute Childhood Diarrhea with Homeopathic Medicine: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Nicaragua,"
Jennifer Jacobs, L. Jimenez, Margarita, Stephen Gloyd,
American Journal of Pediatrics. May 1994; 93: 719-725.
This trial in cooperation with the
University of Washington and the University of Guadalajara involved 81 children aged from 6 months to 5 years in a
randomised, double-blind trial of intravenous fluids plus placebo versus intravenous fluids plus homoeopathic remedy individualised to the patient. The treatment group had a statistically significant decrease in duration of diarrhoea.
The results showed that, the individualized homeopathic medicine showed clinically and statistically significant improvement in the children’s diarrhea, compared to the children treated with placebo.
Children that received homeopathic medicine recovered from infection 20% faster than the children treated with placebo. The children who were more sick reacted to the homeopathic treatment in a spectacular manner. In total the study used 18 different homeopathic medicines selected on an individualized basis according to the symptoms of each child.