@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:Such groups always overestimate their own influence over other groups, I think.
Such a plan is ultimately suicidal and unappealing to average Americans, I think.
Ed, its not very ofen that we agree, but this time: I believe u hit the target bull'seye.
Most of the time when I 'm called a gun "nut" I accept it as mindless,
ad hominem mudslinging,
but such activity as this is genuine mental illness -- separation from reality -- that includes
use of weaponry. However unusual it may be, in this instance,
thay really r gun "nuts". As u have noted, Ed, their beliefs include
exaggerated notions of influence over other citizens, reminiscent
of Charlie Manson 's "helter skelter" psychosis.
Having
acknowledged all of that,
let 's turn our attention a few theoretical degrees of arc, to wit:
what if
W or Obama got to like the job enuf as to make a deal
with the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the Armed Forces, maybe after
some convenient emergency (like the Reichstag fire) and suspended
elections indefinitely, declaring that in furtherance
of the "
GENERAL WELFARE" clause of the Constitution,
it was obviously in America 's general welfare to have
his sage leadership continue permanently.
WHATAYASAY ??
"OK, what the hell, we 've had elections long enuf" ??
Of course, it coud never happen here . . . .
As long as we
assume that, that 'll be good enuf.