Obviously you have no idea about what you are trying to impress us with.
1. Universal Flood--This is total Bullshit because for every age since the Hadean we have full stratigraphic records of deposits in streams , lakes, rivers etc, as well as sand dunes and loess. Obviously, if theres a stream, it indicates that there is running fresh watr on lnd.
Whether you wih to believe it is immaterial because all the data fits and is a compltely usful tool in mapping of geological resources. A universal Flood would lave a special kind of deposit and we dont see these deposits overtoppingland masses. If you believe in a Flood, you cannot possibly accept the science of Global Tectonics (continental drift), because theres gotta be a continental mass or masses that exist.
The Bible is a compilation of tales for development of anything but science.
2, The geological record is actually full of fossils of creatures an plants "Morphing" from one form to another. It also includes the full record of the entire life spans of entire Phyla of living things (plants, animals, archae etc). We are fining new fosil beds almost weekly and these deposits of stratigraphic material give us a lear picture of deep time.
How do you think oil is found?? Certainly not by Creationist thinking.
Look, you are totally free to live your belief system, just dont try to pass it off as scientific knowledge or to further pollute our kids minds with your Baseless (evidence-free) bullshit in public school biology . Well take you to court and win , as weve done for more cases than Rudy Giuliani has brought in the 2020 election.
The only case your side ever won in the USwas the Dayton Tennessee "Scopes Trial" and that was merely a set-up to test Tennessee's Butler Laws requiring that evolution be struck from the HS cience curricula. Even though SCops lost in the trial, the appeals caused the Butler Laws to be dropped almost 25 yers later
If you believe that your side is right you should not do any deep investigation into atomic energy (since half life and nuclear constants are known quantities like pi). Or Im afraid youd be stunned in how the genomes can be tracked through derivative species through recent time (The present is key to the past).
The thing that kinda does piss me off is how the CReationists use fraudulent science to try to make their point. Like the "red blood cell" You relly dont realize that the deposits of the contained red blood cells were dated by several methods of radio nuclide as well as stable isotope methods and all agreed that the samples were from the id Cretaceous. (Creationists tried to pull some BS over the eyes of the public by trying to date 67 MILLION year old fossils by Carbon 14 (a totally invalid test at ages beyond about 55 K years. The creationists had even "doped" a few specimens with shellac (a recent CC14 vessel) and got phony dates of 40K yars before the lab actually discovered the tricks involved and dismissed the sample validity.
As Richard Dawkins once said,
"the reason I accept standard science in evolution theory is that all the data WORKS" . There are literally hundreds of thousands of research scientists involved in all aspects of the sciences underpinning evolutionary theory and they all tightly coalesce over the same facts and these facts are yrly being further evidenced by new more complete findings tht securely fit within the overall theory. Right now the research is more involved with applications of the theory not just describing fossils in their environment.
What ar the Creationists doing?? Theyre busy tryin to , either support some Biblical stories with Bullshit or else are involved with quasi scientistic writing in the fields of ID .
You guy hve more problems with your own kind than you do with science. SCience easily argues down your points of discussion (its just not that important though), what you guys have is arguments about "old Earth", "Young Earth" "Theistic Evolution" "Intelligent Design by first cause or an actual DSesigner".