What fools like you fail to understand is that if I were to ignore opinion I would be a bigot
This sentence right here explains your inability to comprehend simple sentences: your lexicon contains the wrong definitions...for instance, your sentence here doesn't make any sense since a bigot is "One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ." I can't see that you ignoring my opinion should be a sign of being a bigot.
It seems I am forever defining words for you.
Of course you have.
And what is your explanation?
If you werent a bigot you would have read it by now
So, by me not understanding something you wrote or not reading it makes me a bigot, even if your rebuttal is so preposterous that it belongs in the Guinness World's Record of Creationist Straw-men Arguments ?
I gave you the verses from the Bible that teach or promote that the Earth is flat...deal with it.
Yes, I did...just in case you missed them, here they are again:
Deu 28:49, Deu 28:64, Deu 33:17, 1 Sam 2:10, Job 1:7, Job 28:24, Job 37:3, Psa 2:8, Psa 19:4, Psa 22:27, Psa 33:13, Psa 33:14, Psa 48:10, Psa 59:13, Psa 61:2, Psa 65:5, Psa 72:8
Dome : Gen 1:6-7, Gen 1:14-17...ignore them all your want...they won't disappear from the Bible.
Pray no-one checks you up on that or you will look even more of a fool...assuming that is possible.
And how is this helping you with your argument?
Do you see what happens when you try logic ? You fall flat....Eratosthene calculated the earth's radius
Eratosthenes of Cyrene (Greek Ἐρατοσθένης; c. 276 BC " c. 195 BC) was a Greek mathematician, elegiac poet, athlete, geographer, and astronomer. He was the first person to use the word "geography" and invented the discipline of geography as we understand it. He made several discoveries and inventions including a system of latitude and longitude. HE WAS THE FIRST PERSON TO CALCULATE THE CIRCUMFERENCE of the earth by using a measuring system using stades, or the length of stadiums during that time period (with remarkable accuracy), and the tilt of the Earth's axis (also with remarkable accuracy); he may also have accurately calculated the distance from the earth to the sun and invented the leap day"
- he didnt prove it was round.
What the hell is a circumference?
Columbus didnt prove the earth was round - he calculated the circumference to be a third of what it really is
What? Columbus didn't prove the earth to be round? What the hell is a circumference then? Are you making things up as you go?
. Early sailing peoples knew the earth was round - they didnt prove it.
If the "early sailing peoples" had the knowledge that the world was round, how come they thought that if they sailed to the end of the world, something like this might happened?
Don't ignore the question...just explain it.
The author's of the Bible knew the earth was round - thats why you cant produce evidence they thought it was flat.
But I already did...see above.
Sphere - do you mean the hebrew word sphr meaning book or the greek word sphaira meaning globe or ball ?
We now agree that the ancients had a word for "sphere"...you are debunking your own nonsensical argument...only if you were smart enough to notice.
Round - the origins are uncertain but do you mean fullness ?
"Fullness" of what? What in the name of Einstein are you talking about? A sphere is a three dimensional object...like a cube....or prism:
...what does "fullness" has to do with it? Come on, Mi'te...focus!
You prove again to be a wishful thinker when it comes your knowledge.
I will have to lend you my mirror, so you could be able to wipe your mouth from all the human excrement bursting out of your mouth every time you open it.
The ancients knew the world was curved in all directions.
Wrong again...if they knew that the world was round or a spherical, the religious institution (especially the Catholic one) would not have rejected the idea....and why did the church reject the idea, Ionus?
Understand now ?
Yes...you are the most incoherent and ignorant person I ever met.
And when you say natural you mean unnatural....
I mean the natural world that exists without a deity or god that is unnatural.
But science was complete then..
You will have to explain yourself here...how was science complete back then when everything society believed was derived from myths? How do you account for the Dark Ages?
it knew everything just like it knows everything today
This is why I think you either need to be in a mental institution or need to go back to 5th grade.
it is not possible for knowledge to exist that you are not aware of
you are the Great Gayson Prodmemore
Great argument! Ten more points!
Science is now complete.
Science is complete, indeed...you're the best example of a human crossed wit an ass.
So how does a placebo work ? You are the dumbest....you were the runt of the litter, right ?
Ten more point for argumentative skills! WOW!
If you had any scientific training you would know there is more to science than one opinion or fools like you would be out of control.
Again, it was beyond your comprehension and ability
let's give it a try...
Right now with have the technology to eliminate pollution, and because of political matters concerning money, and the Christian notion that Jesus will come and we need not to save the Earth because of it, the world is where it is now...do you want me to continue further? I think I will have to. Just let me know.
We already covered this one...remember the church encouraging its followers to multiply and the rejection or nonbeliever in birth control?
Come on, you can do better than this.
lots of gadgets that no-one needs but has to have
I don't see how relevant this is to the argument, but let me tell you that I don't need to argue with you, but you provide me with so much amusement.
consumerism that is destroying our natural resource and heritage
Go back to the Christian belief that the world is coming to an end.
creation of super-germs that could wipe us out
Who are creating these "super-germs", the Taliban or those Christians who think that Jesus is coming and the world is coming to an end, or people who are experimenting with viruses for the betterment of humanity?
...the list is long and I tire of typing for a fool like you.
Are you "tire"? I haven't caught my second wind yet...come on, Bozo...don't give up.
The nuclear weapon stockpile was natures idea...sorry for you that would be unnatures idea....or a religious invention ?
Science doesn't kill anybody...just leave the nuclear technology to the religious nut and tell me what might happen....Ionus, you are so easy.
So the non-religious nazis who used science were the good guys ?
This is another very old straw-man argument derived from creationists ignorance, that the Nazis were not religious but were atheists...this argument has been debunked so many times, my black and white friend....it's like you've never heard about this argument in your life...the video below is self explanatory:
It was the evil christian countries that caused WWII....
your stupidity is setting a new standard for an IQ test...albeit the minimum.
Ignorance has never been a virtue, Ionus.
For once, Gayson Prodmemore, you are making sense. You agree with me.
Are you sure you've read my post correctly? This is what I wrote:
we must promote education and separation of church and state for the citizens of the world.
Is this a 180 degree turn from your part?
It looks like a little man with a chip on his shoulder and narcistic homosexual tendencies with a degree of stupidity unequaled even on the internet[...] A fact from you...your big chance for a first and you blew it...dont tell your mum.
You are the best debater of all times ...ten more points!
"Real men of Geeeeniusss... ugh"...we salute you.
Oh I am convinced you like it. Let me guess..you were trying to take a picture of your arse for Gayboy International (centrefold play bunny) when the camera slipped due to excessive use of KY.
Are you having another psychotic episode?
You do realise I am australian ?
No worries, Mi'te?