I don't ask anyone to kiss my ass, and a comment like that seems to me to be indicative of some obsession of yours, which it now appears goes back years to a comment i made which pissed you off. I suspect that i simply observed that to veterans of the Federal armies in 1865, the surrender of Joe Johnston at Durham on April 29th represented the end of the war. I'm not going to bother to look it up, because it's not important--except perhaps to you.
I state without any fear of contradiction that you seem to confuse "friendship" with sycophancy.
As far as the thread I brought up re: Joe Johnston v the Trans Mississippi Campaign. When that thread appeared, you were calling me evry name in the book . You were outraged and were (in my mind, covered with spittle). I was really concerened that I set you off on some crazy "setantrum". SO, over the years I tried to stay awy from getting you riled. I see from several therads that this isnt even a possibility . SO, what to do
1avoid you, naaah, Im starting to get a kick out of your approach to threads where someone asks for the time and you tell em how to make a watch.
2Ignore you-naah, youre not enough of a diversion
3Try to stay on your less irritated side. Naaah, I think I like being a burr.
As far as anyone else is concerned. I saw a post herein and thought it was funny. Set sounded just like spendi , what with a long post that was going nowhere. SO , in a failed attempt at humor, I let it out and set began giving me his theory of "angerless contempt". That was worth the admission price alone.
Ill back away and let the subject continue after some words from your sponsor, Set the omnivorous.