Reply
Mon 27 Oct, 2003 04:00 am
Well, what next? Now the Libertarian Party wants to have it's own state.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/27/national/27LIBE.html?hp=&pagewanted=print&position=
I don't quite know what to make of this. Do you? And what do the residents of New Hampshire make of it?
Nothing wrong with it, in my opinion. The people in the article seem not to be dangerous types, even though i wouldn't necessarily agree with them on many things. If they pull it off, they'll be in the right to make the state over in their image. I do doubt that they would pull it off, but you never know.
It's cold, but New Hampshire IS a pretty state. If I were 20 years younger..............
Separation
Wonder which state the Democrats will choose? They're already in a state of confusion.
I wonder why something like this hasn't happened in earlier years. With our increasing mobility it seems like an easier way to run government. Find an area that is closest to your views and move there instead of constant political battles every where.
Quote:from the article: Can't you make a warmer state an option?
LOL!
Fishin' I think that this has been done... that's why there are so many wackos in Idaho. A bunch of neo-nazis moved there so they could be "free."
Separation
Yeah, that would be great. When everyone makes their move and gets into the right state, then the Republicans can make a preemptive strike and go to war with the Democrats. It's going to be lots of fun.
Piffka wrote: Fishin' I think that this has been done... that's why there are so many wackos in Idaho. A bunch of neo-nazis moved there so they could be "free."
Ok, you guys keep the whackos out west then. That seems fair enough. Only "normal" people can move to NH. lol
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. We want the "normal" ones!!!!!!!
Quote:I wonder why something like this hasn't happened in earlier years.
Have you ever been to Utah?
Oh jeez, no wonder you left the west!
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace