@oristarA,
Quote:The context below says " rich children were caught up by poor children at the age of 6 in IQ". I don't understand why "were" can be neglected.
Context:
It turns out that babies who had low IQs at 22 months and were born to richer, better educated parents caught up by the age of 6 with children
It might be, [only 'might' I say], that in your language, Ori, the idea is that the children are the passive receipients of learning from their teachers, which makes you feel that a passive structure is required here.
It turns out that babies who had low IQs at 22 months and were born to richer, better educated parents
were caught up
to other children [by their teachers] by the age of 6.
Here, the children are seen as the ones doing the "catching up", so it's in the active voice.