14
   

Video: Obama Fields Questions From GOP

 
 
Irishk
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Feb, 2010 11:53 am
At the end of the day, they have to answer to their constituents. Including all those who voted against their own party's healthcare bill (and there were a bunch of them).
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Feb, 2010 04:07 pm
@Diest TKO,
Well, I'd suggest you take remedial training in mind-reading, because you're really bad at it.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Feb, 2010 04:08 pm
@slkshock7,
slkshock7 wrote:

Well, I'd suggest you take remedial training in mind-reading, because you're really bad at it.


What, you're going to come out and admit something like that? Please!

You'll be happy to know that Obama is indeed doing the same thing with Senate Dems next week; as for the cameras, I don't know.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Feb, 2010 06:49 pm
@slkshock7,
slkshock7 wrote:

Good to see the transparency on discussions between the President and the GOP. Shines a light for the voters on the inner workings of the party as well as on the willingness or unwillingness of the President and opposing party members to truly be bipartisan. Case in point, Price from GA.

Now would it be too much to ask that the President and the Dems be equally transparent? Take anyone of the current hot-button issues being debated in Congress right now. It sure would be refreshing to see these debates on CSPAN and be able to identify who the reasonable Dems are as well as the unbending nut-cases in the Dem party.

Of course, this will never happen. Transparency to Obama and the Dems is required only of the GOP.


In fact, I just read that yes, there will be cameras present at next week's meeting between Obama and the Dems. So, that which you said will never happen, has in fact been planned to happen.

Cycloptichorn
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Feb, 2010 11:26 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Well, for once I'm glad to be proven wrong...Talk to you next week after that meeting.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Feb, 2010 11:28 am
@slkshock7,
slkshock7 wrote:

Well, for once I'm glad to be proven wrong...Talk to you next week after that meeting.


It's actually today I think! I'm reading some analysis right now, let me see if I can find a link to the video.

Cycloptichorn
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Feb, 2010 12:52 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
So we were both wrong! I noticed that when I started searching for a date next week...you can find the video on CSPAN. Another 90 minute marathon, but Obama did well. Lot of slams to the Repubs as the party of no, implying that Obama and the dems now think the filibuster is more problematic than either healthcare or the economy. Interesting that the only question on healthcare came from Sen Gillibrand of NY and she's merely interested in getting 9-11 responders health care. Obama brought up healthcare on several occasions but primarily just stressed the need to pass it. He offered no constructive suggestions of getting the bill(s) thru their current impasse..

Clearly not as antagonistic as when he faced the Repub House caucus, but wouldn't necessarily expect the Dem Senate Caucus to be an equivalent. He was tossed mostly softball questions, but two moderate Dems, Blanche Lincoln (on his willingness to push back against more liberal elements of Dem party) and Evan Bayh (on public mistrust of the Dem party) asked some that were more forceful.

Will be looking forward to the promised Q&As with the Senate Repubs (which I would expect to be similarly civil) and the House Dems.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Feb, 2010 12:53 pm
@slkshock7,
I don't see why this shouldn't go on all the time. It really lays out the differences between the parties clearly and is an improvement over the way our system is currently working.

Cycloptichorn
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Feb, 2010 05:25 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cyclo,
Looks like Obama's nixed the idea

Quote:
Despite the widespread popularity of President Obama's question-and-answer forums and the apparent boost they've given to his agenda, the White House shot down a proposal on Wednesday to make such open forums a regular feature.

Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton relayed the news during Wednesday's briefing, calling the idea of standardizing "question time" good in concept but impractical in practice.

"David Axelrod has talked about this a little," Burton said. "And what he had to say is: part of the reason Friday was so successful with the GOP conference was the spontaneity that occurred there. And it is going to be hard to recreate the spontaneity that happened."

Burton added that the president "thinks that there is space for more open dialogue, and he is going to look for more opportunities to do things on camera and have open discussions on important issues." But it was clear that the administration is not willing to incorporate a British-parliament-style Q&A session into American governance. An interesting question for constitutional scholars is whether Congress has the power to make this happen on its own. Meanwhile, the last time the president held an open news conference with reporters was back in late July.


Got no idea what Axelrod is talking about when he speaks of "spontaneity". I speculate that they originally recognized the risk Obama was taking in meeting with the opposition party but couldn't dissuade him. They were then surprised about the favorable response but attributed it as a one-time good thing and decided not to accept the risk on a regular basis.

Too bad...I think Obama's promise for more and more transparency is compromised severely when events like this are dismissed.
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Feb, 2010 10:20 am
Here's the transcript for the Democrat Senate Q&A...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/02/03/obama_transcript_meeting_qa_senate_democrats_100158.html
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Feb, 2010 10:45 am
@slkshock7,
Quote:

Got no idea what Axelrod is talking about when he speaks of "spontaneity". I speculate that they originally recognized the risk Obama was taking in meeting with the opposition party but couldn't dissuade him. They were then surprised about the favorable response but attributed it as a one-time good thing and decided not to accept the risk on a regular basis.

Too bad...I think Obama's promise for more and more transparency is compromised severely when events like this are dismissed.


I can see where they don't want to set up situations where the Republicans know he's coming and can set traps for him. But that's just Washington Insider-ism talking; he would handle it fine and people like it, makes for good TV and gives folks a real look at our elected officials in action.

I think it's also too bad. I would love to see some Pelosi-Boehner debates tho!

Cycloptichorn
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Feb, 2010 11:27 am
@Cycloptichorn,
If Obama did Cyclo, then every President would have to do it.


President Palin, "Gosh, golly, I have no idea what you are talking about. Let's just lower taxes to pay for it."
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Feb, 2010 03:23 pm
Well looks like scripting and muzzling of the more dissatisfied Dem Senators did occur, just not in front of the President...not clear if that muzzling was voluntary or coerced...from The Hill.

Quote:
Senate Democrats held back from asking President Barack Obama about healthcare reform during a carefully scripted question-and-answer session in front of television cameras.

With the cameras rolling, a group of senators selected in advance by the Democratic leadership asked questions about such topics as partisan gridlock and GOP obstruction.

But once the president left and reporters were escorted out of the room, senators pressed White House officials about healthcare reform, according to those at the meeting.
Democrats expressed their frustration with the lack of a clear plan for passing healthcare reform, according to one person in the room.

One Democratic senator even grew heated in his remarks, according to the source.

“It wasn’t a discussion about how to get from Point A to Point B; it was a discussion about the lack of a plan to get from Point A to Point B,” said a person who attended the meeting. “Many of the members were frustrated, but one person really expressed his frustration.”

Senators did not want to press Obama on healthcare reform in front of television cameras for fear of putting him in an awkward spot.

“There was a vigorous discussion about that afterward with some of his top advisers and others,” Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) said regarding the healthcare discussion.

“I think people were probably aware that there was no easy answer and this is being broadcast on live national television and didn’t want to put him on the spot,” Bayh said.
Irishk
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Feb, 2010 09:09 am
@slkshock7,
Quote:
“There was a vigorous discussion about that afterward with some of his top advisers and others,” Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) said regarding the healthcare discussion.


Too bad they didn't keep the cameras rolling for that.
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Feb, 2010 05:24 pm
@Irishk,
Agree...rumor has it that the hottest Senator in the room was Franken. Never did like that little jerk, but he's move up a little in my estimation.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Feb, 2010 06:12 pm
@Diest TKO,
Diest TKO wrote:
This is my point. If the meeting didn't play out like you think it would, you'd be accusing the dems of muzzling. You'd probably not be satisfied that any of the questions were tough enough.

slkshock7 wrote:
Well, I'd suggest you take remedial training in mind-reading, because you're really bad at it.

slkshock7 wrote:
Well looks like scripting and muzzling of the more dissatisfied Dem Senators did occur, just not in front of the President...not clear if that muzzling was voluntary or coerced...


T
K
O
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 02:35:58