@aidan,
David wrote:Rebecca:
The central point is that the country of origin
is rightfully entitled to credit for the creative success
of its citizens FOREVER.
Did u see my edited supplement wherein I pointed out
that War and Peace will always be Russian Literature,
never American Literature, even if EVERY single American read the book?
aidan wrote:No, sorry I missed that. But I do see your point.
David wrote:Its still Mexican food; b4 Texas became a state, it was part of Mexico.
In millions of years, it will still be Mexican food. Its a fact of history.
aidan wrote:Ah-hah! And people are always getting upset and saying that when Americans say America - they only
mean the US and negate Canada and Mexico.
Yes, including the author of this thread who asks us to identify strictly American food
as distinct from the cuisine of anywhere else, such as Mexico.
aidan wrote:I get their point, so I think we should start being more politically correct
and accurately include Mexico in our thoughts when we say 'America'
so we could include Mexican food when we say American food.
I will resist being politically correct, unless thay agree with me; then I 'm stuck with them.
Mexican food remains Mexican food, regardless of where or by whom it is eaten.
aidan wrote:That'd be a way I could legitimately include enchiladas and tamales on my menu.
I am confident that the author of this thread meant the
USA, not Mexico. If I am rong,
I 'm sure that I will be corrected.
Aidan wrote:And isn't integrating the food of a people
part and parcel of integrating those people?
David replied:
Quote: I dunno, but I think that 's off topic.
aidan wrote:I don't think so. I think it speaks directly to the determination of the definition of American food.
The country of the origin of the food will always have bragging rights.
U can 't rip that off. As I pointed out:
War and Peace will always be Russian Literature,
not American lit, nor Brazilian lit, regardless of whether it is read in those places; the same applies to food.
David wrote:Yes, its not.
The point of America was to have a place to escape from England,
as I understood it. (I believe this is off topic.)
aidan wrote: That might be why we left, but that doesn't adequately describe
what we decided to try to achieve once we got here.
We decided to live our lives in freedom by strangling the domestic powers of government;
we did not decide to rip off the intellectual property rights
of other countries by inflicting an American plagiarism upon them.
aidan wrote:David - you're such an interesting mix of libertarian and conservative.
This is what it is and this is only what it is and this is all it can
ever be- how libertarian is that? What a constricted viewpoint.
The truth is constricted to the facts; this is a matter of truthful labeling;
accurate identification qua origin.
Libertarians r not liberals (who deal in deception).
aidan wrote:In my mind it's not a matter of taking credit -
it's a matter of becoming welcoming and inclusive - making room
and being accepting of diversity and variety. Becoming more
together than our parts alone would allow us to be otherwise.
If u allege that lasagna is
AMERICAN food, u may well
have very
irate, indignant Italians holding u to account
for
plagiarism. Do u tolerate plagiarism in your students ?
What do u tell them about intellectual honesty ?
aidan wrote:Besides, I'm not particularly fond of corn.
But I'm thrilled that I could have eggs benedict on the menu.
Anyway - always a pleasure comparing ideas with you.
Likewise, Rebecca.