Reply
Sun 3 Jan, 2010 08:53 pm
Context:
Such differences of opinion can rarely be resolved by trading examples or anecdotes, or arguing from first principles. It more often helps to apply some psychology. With this in mind, some colleagues and I devised a series of experiments inspired by "costly signalling theory" - the idea that animals, including humans, use costly, intricate and hard-to-fake signals to flaunt their biological fitness to potential mates and social partners. Our goal was to see how thinking about mating influences people's decisions about spending and giving (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol 93, p 85).
In this context, it means forming a sexual partnership for the purpose of reproduction. Marriage is irrelevant.
yes marriage.
But more than that as well, mating in the sense of sexual joining.
@dadpad,
The verb to mate implies those aspects of reproduction, sexual coupling and partner choice that we share with the animals, as the wording makes clear. Animals do not marry.