Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Dec, 2009 10:46 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
I read the syndicated column in the Charlotte Observer. I think it was originally in the NYT's. I saw nothing that was childish.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Reply Thu 24 Dec, 2009 01:56 pm
@Advocate,
The author wasn't making an objective attempt to explain why Lieberman takes the positions he takes.

Attacking someone personally because one disagrees with his positions is childish or bitchy - take your pick.

Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Dec, 2009 02:20 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Whatever! However, she makes a lot of sense.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Reply Thu 31 Dec, 2009 10:35 pm
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:

Whatever! However, she makes a lot of sense.


"Whatever!"

Has there ever been a more succinct and intellectual response to an argument?
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Reply Thu 31 Dec, 2009 10:37 pm
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:

However, she makes a lot of sense.


Oh yes, I think we have already established that you have an affinity for any argument (spurious or otherwise) that attacks Lieberman.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Lieberman logic
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/15/2024 at 12:51:06