Lieberman logic

I read the syndicated column in the Charlotte Observer. I think it was originally in the NYT's. I saw nothing that was childish.

The author wasn't making an objective attempt to explain why Lieberman takes the positions he takes.

Attacking someone personally because one disagrees with his positions is childish or bitchy - take your pick.

Whatever! However, she makes a lot of sense.

"Whatever!"

Has there ever been a more succinct and intellectual response to an argument?

Oh yes, I think we have already established that you have an affinity for any argument (spurious or otherwise) that attacks Lieberman.