@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:
I have only seen one angle from you : women must be in the military.
I've never stated that they MUST be in the military, only that they should not be denied access to it. There is a significant functional difference here. People, both male and female, have a side range of skills and things they can offer the military. It is illogical to deny a person access who has skills the military wants/needs. I am not advocating that we force people, male or female into the military.
Ionus wrote:
You tried to play down my experience. Somehow you got your ego involved. I am the one entitled to have their ego involved, I put up with this rubbish that you say must not exist because it is politically incorrect.
Well it does exist.
It is very difficult to take you serious when you are arguing not only for what you are entitled to but that what you are entitled to is having your ego involved.
Play down your experience? You're just another person. You get to provide input, not demand to be the judge/referee.
Ionus wrote:
Your "lets everyone pretend it is working attitude" is driven by your inability to expand your mind to comprehend there is a problem, never mind a solution.
Why would I need to provide a solution for women being in the military, when I believe they should not be denied access? All the problems they seem to cause in your so called "examples" are of men not doing their job, and you blaming the women for being in their proximity. You are trying to take one person's actions and make someone else accountable for them.
In your example, if the male soldier does not do his job, the women should be kicked out. This argument was doomed from the start.
T
K
O