@aidan,
aidan wrote:
Someone might answer, 'because people are not God'... but that's only relevant for people who believe in God and who believe the fetus is not just a clump of cells.
Well, that is actually a very appropriate argument.
People are not God, and don't get to automatically emulate the actions of God.
And, you are perfectly correct that such an argument is only relevant to people who believe in God, but it should be pointed out that it is entirely relevant to persons who profess to believe in God, but would counter the argument (Eva).
I, for one, don't assert that the people who believe a fetus is "just a clump of cells," also don't believe in God.
It does not follow that belief in God requires the belief that a fetus is an individual human being.
Who cares, though, whether or not you believe in God?
If you believe that the fetus is a human life independant of the mother, you don't have to believe in God to accept a moral imperative that forbids the destruction of that independent life.
It's not about what God tells you, it's about what you believe to be true.
We can all post all sorts of comments in this forum, but when we go to bed at night, most of us know what we truly believe.
If you truly believe that the fetus is not just a mass of cells, similar to a tumor, then you need to reconcile your desire to end its existence with its right to exist.
I don't subscribe to moral relativism, but if a woman truly believes that she is ridding her body of a mass of cells, similar to a tumor, when she has an abortion, than I may be certain she is wrong, but I will have a hard time faulting her decision making.
Fact of the matter is that I don't believe there is more than 1% of women who undergo abortions who believe they are ridding themselves of an unwanted clump of cells.
Legally, women can rid themselves of lumps of cells and individual lives.
Whether or not something is legal has never been an assurance that it is moral.