0
   

numbers were stratospheric?

 
 
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2009 05:51 am
numbers were stratospheric = numbers increased dramatically?
Context:
Although no incidents of swine flu in North Korea have been officially reported, and it is unlikely that the authorities would report them in any case unless numbers were stratospheric, it is true that there is a high possibility of an explosive outbreak in a destitute country such as North Korea.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 394 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2009 07:25 am
@oristarA,
It means "very, very high". Not necessarily "increased dramatically", just very high.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2009 07:44 am
Yes, that's it.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2009 07:02 pm
Thank you both
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » numbers were stratospheric?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 10/10/2024 at 10:24:16