0
   

in losses from a private-contract job

 
 
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 02:27 am

in losses from a private-contract job = in the expense of a private-contract job?

Context:
Energy-savings project leaves Army in the cold
By Ralph Vartabedian
It projects millions of dollars in losses from a private-contract job to upgrade a steam power plant in Alaska. The case highlights flaws in the government's energy contracts program.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 530 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 06:14 am
@oristarA,
"losses" stands for money spent without result. This means that money was paid to a contractor who did not deliver paid for services.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 06:42 am
@engineer,
Thanks.
I still don't get "It projects millions of dollars in losses from a private-contract job to upgrade a steam power plant".
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 07:30 am
@oristarA,
The government hired an outside (non-government) company to do upgrades to a power plant. That firm billed the government and either did not do the work or did it incorrectly. The government lost the money and still doesn't have an upgraded power plant. When it says it "projects" it means the government doesn't have the actual number yet. "Projects" means "estimates". Does that help?
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2009 01:39 am
@engineer,
It helps.
It is the word "project" that was the trouble maker.
Thank you.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » in losses from a private-contract job
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/01/2024 at 06:25:24