@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:farmerman wrote:
Theres really no reason why the committee couldnt have stated that "We aint giving a Peace Prize this year".
There isn't one, besides perhaps the statutes of Norwegian Nobel Committee, which say that the prize is awarded annually according to guidelines laid down in Alfred Nobel's will.
There are many people who put their lives and reputations at stake even as they toil for peace and human rights in relative obscurity, for whom the Nobel Prize could have meant a lot.
Of the top candidates identified in Saab's post, I think Tsangvirai would have been a problematic choice, but he still would have deserved it as the anti-Mugabe and as symbol for all those MDC activists who were beaten, tortured or murdered by Mugabe's regime. The other two I hadn't even heard of, but I'll certainly read up now, it seems like they've been doing awesome work.
As you wrote later on about the intent of the Nobel prize, "There are some [..] who really can need that money or the prestige." Among Obama and the three listed in Saab's post, Obama is in need of them least. He doesn't need the extra prestige abroad, where -- aside from a couple of places like Israel/Palestine and Iran, where the Nobel Prize won't change any minds anyhow - he is still enjoying his post-Bush honeymoon of relief. And at home this will strengthen the backlash more than it will strengthen his prestige.