Robert,
Last nite, I answered a post (hereinbelow set forth)
that had negative implications against me,
tho I was not mentioned by name.
I sought to explain, by way of vindication of my position,
tho this entailed going off topic. Much vitriolic
ad hominem acrimony ensued,
when someone, in essence, accused me of what amounts to
MALICE
in killing threads and to be as irritating as possible in the process.
This amounts accusation of intentional sadism.
It seems to me that, morally, if someone wishes to answer
a direct or indirect remark about him, then
some degree
of going off topic is reasonable for this purpose.
I confess that I was rong in getting into juvenile militia warfare
in Burma; that was too remote from the thread.
I regret a deviation to that extent. I got caught up in the moment.
I don 't mean that explanatory, defensive posting
shoud be carried out to the extent
of killing the thread by the off topic venture.
I usually endeavor to remain on topic,
tho I am not a rigid fanatic about it.
Will u reveal your views on this point ?
David
http://able2know.org/topic/136591-12#post-3770155
Previous • Post: # 3,770,155 • Next
dyslexia
1 Reply Quote report Sun 27 Sep, 2009 10:12 am
Re: OmSigDAVID(Post 3770149)
Quote:I imagine that people make erroneous decisions at all ages.
Yes, there are even thoseadults that suggest that 7 yr olds should carry firearms.