LIBERALS = CLAUSTROMANIACS ??

KNOW IT FOR WHAT IT IS:

The debate over citizen's possession of guns in America
is an ideological battle
to bring about the Re-ORGANIZATION n Re-DISTRIBUTION OF POWER
FROM the 1791 model social contract of the Bill of Rights,
TO the 2Oth Century model of collectivism,
with unlimited trust n worship of authority.

The repressionists [liberals] insist that
we citizens have no right to any personal power
(except one Tuesday in November),
that all power rightfully belongs to society n its instrument, the state
n that individuals are expendable,
that any decent, right minded citizen
shud willingly offer up the sacrifice of his life, n
of his friends' lives preferring the well being of
the state n society, deferring to their unquestioned authority
(as children vu their parents ?).

When the USA began,
their creators were individualists,
and SUCCESSFUL REVOLUTIONARIES, so gave ONLY
limited authority to government
(explicity putting control of guns
beyond the reach of government so as to ensure
that they'd always be more powerful that government,
JUST IN CASE).

Therefore, collectivist societarians dedicated to the state,
and the worshippers of authority
knew that their success cud only be effected
by deception, liberalism, mendacity n fraud
(in this case, jiggling words like "militia",
so as to get GOVERNMENT in on the act).

The leftists, predominantly in the cities,
demand full faith in government,
with no reservation of power to any individual citizen,
even if his life depends upon it.


In effect, the leftists have raised up
a false god of collectivism;
their religion is authoritarianism,

the OPPOSITE of the individualism
in which the USA were born.

With every terrorist act,
or crime, they will argue, like a mantra, that "this proves
that we need to watch individuals progressively more closely
and to
control them more thoroughly n severely "; that better security
is to be found in MORE chains on the individual,

and that every decent individual will nobly n eagerly
welcome the chains, CHEERING, as they are clamped onto him

for the greater good of society
(each member of whom will be so attired),

and that the most IDEAL security
will be found in restraining the individual
so that he is rendered 1OO% motionless.

Is that claustromania ??



[If he can move, then he can MAKE guns n other weapons,
as I did, as a child, and weapons are instruments of liberty.]

I CHOOSE FREEDOM OF THE INDIVIDUAL,
as did George Washington, Patrick Henry, James Madison,
Thomas Jefferson, et al.