1
   

NEW AL GORE TV HOPES TO AVOID 'LIBERAL' LABEL

 
 
Reply Mon 13 Oct, 2003 12:57 pm
NEW AL GORE TV HOPES TO AVOID 'LIBERAL' LABEL
Cable Network Will Aim at 'Younger, Hipper' Audience
October 13, 2003 - By Richard Linnett

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Former vice president Al Gore and a group of investors have plans to launch an all-news channel, but it won't be a liberal alternative to Fox News. Instead, it will be aimed at the under-25 crowd.

"Liberal TV is dead on arrival," said an insider advising Mr. Gore and his team. "You just can't do it."

NBC agreement: The Gore-led group of investors is about two weeks away from forming an agreement with Vivendi Universal Entertainment to acquire Canadian-based cable network Newsworld International for about $70 million, said an insider at Universal Television Networks, the Vivendi unit that currently operates the network.

The proposed news network will be positioned as "a professional news operation reaching an aware, younger, hipper audience," the adviser said, characterizing it as a combination of CNN and MTV. "The station will try to reach a younger market."

That's likely to make it more enticing to advertisers who were wary of plunking down ads on a network aligned with a particular political party.

Fragmented youth media: "The question is whether TV is the way young people will get their news or whether it will come to them over the Internet, on some form of PDA with just headlines, scores, stock market and breaking news," said Aaron Cohen, executive vice president and director of broadcast at Horizon Media. "If you want to talk to young people, that's where you go. They haven't grown up to be news viewers yet."

In order to attract the right kind of audience, Mr. Cohen said the network would "have to have some truly unique personalities, a unique skew on the news, lifestyle stuff."

50 million subscribers: Newsworld International, created by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in 1994, has 20 million subscribers and 58 employees. Its news programming originates in North America, Asia and Europe. It was sold to USA Networks in 2000, and then to Vivendi Universal, which sells advertising for the channel through its Universal Television Networks sales force, which also handles SciFi, Trio and USA. According to a sales executive there, the majority of advertising on NWI is direct response. "We haven't been aggressively selling it," said the executive. "We're waiting for distribution to pick up." Advertisers include General Motors Corp., Expedia.com, and package-goods companies.

Last week, General Electric Co., parent of NBC, agreed to buy the entertainment properties of Vivendi Universal. GE will own 80% of the new company, while Vivendi retains 20%. Vivendi's TV properties, which include USA Network, Sci Fi and Trio, will combine with NBC's Bravo, Telemundo, MSNBC and CNBC. NBC Universal, will be the fourth-largest media conglomerate, with revenues of approximately $13 billion, when the deal is finalized in early 2004.

A Gore 'firewall'?: Some observers feel that despite the change in tack, a network led by Mr. Gore will not be able to erect a firewall thick enough to insulate it from his Democratic Party affiliation.

"If there is any transparency to Gore, then it will be identified as a partisan operation, which will alienate advertisers," said the sales executive.

"The problem with being associated as liberal is that they wouldn't be going in a direction that advertisers are really interested in," said Paul Rittenberg, senior VP-advertising and market research, Fox News. "We don't get business for being conservative, we get business because the ratings are good and we believe that we're fair. If you go out and say that you are a liberal network, you are cutting your potential audience and certainly your potential advertising pool, right off the bat. "
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 926 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Oct, 2003 02:41 pm
<to the tune of Dire Straits' "Money for Nothing">

I want my Al TV ....

Now look at them yo-yos
that's the way you do it
you hit the networks with the Al TV
that ain't pol'tickin'
that's the way you do it
lemme tell ya
them guys ain't dumb
maybe wear some earth tones
or talk about the 'net
maybe tell us where they're comin' from....

etc. etc. Think Sting is available?
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Oct, 2003 05:33 pm
Jes
Jes, just what we need. Another network that programs for the under 25 age as if there were not already enough.

BBB
0 Replies
 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2003 11:29 am
Yes, they're just SO bereft of programming.

'Course if they REALLY want to appeal to the younger folk, they'll use tried and true methods:

Al the Vampire Slayer
Gore's Creek
Who wants to marry a Politician?
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2003 12:54 pm
From insider buzz ... well, not really "Insider" so much as trade press, I gather the prospects of this "Revolutionary New Concept in Broadcasting" trend toward a market presence somewhere between shopping channels and televangelists, if even that isn't shooting a bit high. Response from potential advertisers has been tepid at best, ranging from "Wait and see" to "Shee-yit, son, that ain't gonna sell ... whutinhell y'all thinkin'?"
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2003 01:05 pm
It'll make it as far as Phil Donahue's second go, and the magnificantly popular Democratic Talk Radio. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2003 01:09 pm
Interesting that the Dems feel a need to find a better way to bring their message to the people. I sense no matter how they package that message, the people just aren't much interested in taking it off the shelf and hauling it to the checkout line.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2003 01:48 pm
Another reason Dean isn't it.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2003 09:12 am
0 Replies
 
williamhenry3
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2003 10:04 pm
Re: NEW AL GORE TV HOPES TO AVOID 'LIBERAL' LABEL
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:

"The problem with being associated as liberal is that they wouldn't be going in a direction that advertisers are really interested in," said Paul Rittenberg, senior VP-advertising and market research, Fox News. "We don't get business for being conservative, we get business because the ratings are good and we believe that we're fair. If you go out and say that you are a liberal network, you are cutting your potential audience and certainly your potential advertising pool, right off the bat. "


Fox News fair? Gimme a break to barf, please!

I don't think Mr. Gore will try to invent a "liberal" Fox News version for the youth of America.

Liberals not fair? At least we have not yet been the cause of the United States Supreme Court appointing an ultra right-wing Republican as President.

The Fox News exec quoted above is a bit dumb, to say the very least.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2003 11:11 pm
C'mon, now, williamhenry; you don't like Fox because it doesn't bleat the liberal line. and has come from nowhere to challenge and surpass the ratings and advertiser-appeal of The Big Three and PBS. What is fair is that in a fair market, folks can choose. Just because your choice is not satisfying the greater public demand makes neither choice more nor less fair, it simply means fewer folk join you in your choice. If Gore and crew can offer the public something the public will endorse and support, fair enough; the venture will prosper. If the public is uninterested, the venture will fail to prosper. Given that the venture is a Democrat-oriented initiative, I anticipate, in all fairness, it will meet with no more success than Democrat efforts have gained themselves recently in either the electoral or judicial arenas. While the Democrats may provide entertainment, they aren't going to be able to sell it, any more than they've been able to sell their agenda. What is fair is that everyone has equal opportunity to succeed. What is fair is that the Democrats be permitted to choose to do otherwise. Clearly, nobody is preventing them from doing so.

What is dumb is to continue a consistently failed course of action in expectation of improved results. What is dumber yet is to then sue to attempt to reverse the disadvantage one's own shortcomings brought about.
0 Replies
 
williamhenry3
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Oct, 2003 10:18 pm
timberlandko wrote:
What is fair is that in a fair market, folks can choose. Just because your choice is not satisfying the greater public demand makes neither choice more nor less fair, it simply means fewer folk join you in your choice.[/I]

Timber<

Were you to know me better, you would know that I don't care what other people think about me. I have never claimed to be a member of the "greater public." That's because those who are the "greater public" choose outlets like FoxNews which is fine if you like tabloid-style, right-leaning reportage.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » NEW AL GORE TV HOPES TO AVOID 'LIBERAL' LABEL
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/08/2024 at 12:28:49