Modern Puritanism

Forums: Us Politics, Puritanism, Misses The Punchline, One Opinion
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Kicky's "Slave for an hour" thread brought up an idea that has been brewing in my mind for a while. The Puritans have won. The Puritans were obsessed with the idea that people might do anything "odd". They were particularly upset that might enjoy sex, or even experience sex, outside of a narrowly prescribed ritual.

When Kicky posted a "bet" that was obviously a fun part of a consensual relationship-- the shocked and dismayed responses were worried that he have only "consensual sex"-- as if play acting dominance is too aberrant even for consenting adults. Strictly egalitarian sex has become the missionary position of the 21st century.

Add this to the recently discussed scarlet letter but on the "cheating husband", and the dismay expressed that anyone could enjoy a strip club, or a fling without showing disrespect for half the human race.

Human beings have sex-- usually with multiple partners over a lifetime and often in many different ways. When is society going to accept this? If the people involved find this fulfilling or enjoyable, why is it the business of anyone else.

It seems to me, in a modern society, marital infidelity should have nothing to do with someone's political career. Society has no business keeping two consenting adults for exchanging sex for money.

Americans feel justified judging, and even controlling the practices of others. I don't think this is the same in other countries-- in some cases leaders are expected to have a robust and healthy sexuality. It the curse of our Puritan heritage.

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 2 • Views: 1,945 • Replies: 13

No top replies

@ebrown p,

You are a very sick man and I'm sure that you're destined for Hell unless you repent!

0 Replies

@ebrown p,

Yep, in the old days it was born from a fear of Hell, and now it is born from a fear of almost everything. The fear of Hell was created on purpose by the Church for its own interests, and the fear of modern Americans has been created by the political ruling class for its own interests.

What I find hilarious is that the modern Puritans will blast the old time religous Puritans here at a2k and other places. We get to constantly hear how evolved and how much better we are than they were, when we are doing the same stupid **** all over again. History books exist for a reason, it would be helpful if folks read them.

It would be nice if laws and public disapproval would make people morally pure. So many act as though this will work. What it does is drive what we don't want to see further underground, making it increasingly difficult to deal with.

0 Replies

Sorry, but when a public figure, who has taken a religious vow and entered legal contract with another person, violates those promises (usually using public funds to do it) then they ought to be exposed and relieved of their duty.

I'd have more respect if they either separtated or divorced. But to keep up the "sham" for political, personal gain irks me.

Like it or not, marriage vows are here to stay. You either keep them or have the courage to go it alone.

Apparently, the publlic does not like divorces. I think that there is more shame given to divorce than in living a marriage full of lies and deceit.

1 Reply

@sullyfish6,

Is this something about a "public figure", or would you say the same about a "private figure"?

If you commit some sin (be it adultery or any other sin) should it affect your career? It seems to me that sins you commit that have nothing to do with how you do your job should be your own business.

To me there is a big difference between the misuse of public funds and adultery (the first being related to the job). If we weren't so hung up with what people did in their private lives, there would be less need for expensive cover-ups.

1 Reply

Yes, being a public figure puts you into a category where EVERY move is scrutinized. That's part of the burden and maybe why we have so few who step forward.

On another level: Re: A man or woman who cheats on his spouse.
Would you hire him to do a job?
Handle money?

Just asking.

1 Reply

@ebrown p,

There are two types of public figures. The political one can directly affect society by his/her behavior. The entertainment 'public figure' can influence public behavior by showing it is alright as they can get away with it as long as you are a celebrity. Sports figures would be included.

The private citizen would be dealing with the law and the courts.

1 Reply

Puritans worship a zombie-ghost!

0 Replies

@sullyfish6,

Quote:

On another level: Re: A man or woman who cheats on his spouse.
Would you hire him to do a job?
Handle money?

Of course I would, and you would too. (Or do you run a background check on the people who you hire fix your car.)

The personal lives of people who do work for you is none of your business.

0 Replies

@talk72000,

Quote:

There are two types of public figures. The political one can directly affect society by his/her behavior. The entertainment 'public figure' can influence public behavior by showing it is alright as they can get away with it as long as you are a celebrity. Sports figures would be included.

The private citizen would be dealing with the law and the courts.

First, let's not confuse the law with morality. These are two unrelated topics. Adultery never comes into play in the courts any more (except in civil divorce matters).

It is a Puritan trait to worry about influencing "public behavior". Private citizens commit sins (be it adultery or anything else). Public figures are no different.

The idea that a guy who is very good at throwing a football is going to be any more pure than the average guy who fixes cars for a living is silly. Either way, it is just a job... and ones personal life has nothing to do with how many touchdowns he scores.

Let's just let human beings be human beings. If they are doing their job well (whether it is hitting a ball with a stick, or passing health care legislation or fixing my brakes) then their personal lives are irrelevant.

2 Replies

@ebrown p,

Quote:

The idea that a guy who is very good at throwing a football is going to be any more pure than the average guy who fixes cars for a living is silly. Either way, it is just a job... and ones personal life has nothing to do with how many touchdowns he scores.

yes, but in America at least it is demanded that he attempt to be a beacon of virtue because he is a role model. After all, we can't have our sweet young children see how people really are, they must be shown only examples of purity, and then told that this is what they should grow up to be.

It has everything to do with American unwillingness to deal with reality, of our desire to live our fantasies, our drive to attempt to turn our fantasies into reality.

0 Replies

@ebrown p,

I agree with you that private matters are private matters but we live in an open society and the higher you go up the ladder of success the more the challenges and pitfalls. Gone are the days of the discrete media. People who have gained control of the media are more like bloodhounds now. It goes with the territory. It seems like an equalizer. In the old days no one could or dared to question people on top. Now it is possible to bring down the very top person by his behavior. Remember it was Clinton who signed legislature that allowed the mass media to be controlled by a few people and all the smears and scandals are acts of politics.

1 Reply

@talk72000,

Clinton balanced the budget. That was his job. I didn't care about his extramarital activities.

Look at the great leaders who committed adultery.

- Martin Luther King
- Thomas Jefferson
- JFK
- Albert Einstein
- Princess Diana

Why should anyone care?

I get your point that these days people have the ability to bring down powerful people with their private lives.

I contend our obsession with what anyone does in their private lives is a bad thing.

1 Reply

@ebrown p,

Ha, ha, ha. I didn't know about those 4. I only knew about JFK.

0 Replies

Modern Puritanism

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know