17
   

"O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous!"

 
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 01:45 pm
@Ceili,
Ceili! I haven't seen you in ages -- what a pleasant surprise!
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 01:53 pm
@Thomas,
Good to be seen Thomas, I hope you've been keeping well.
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 03:16 pm
@Ceili,
i liked your post quite a bit. thanx!
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 07:22 pm
Slight tangent, but not entirely - Anyone read Atul Gawande's article in the New Yorker back in early June, "The Cost Conundrum"? He was investigating disparities in medical costs in Texas. Or, "What a Texas Town Can Teach Us About Healthcare."

That was a useful wakeup for me, and I'd appreciate others' take on it if you read it.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all

Here's one of the starter paragraphs -
"McAllen has another distinction, too: it is one of the most expensive health-care markets in the country. Only Miami"which has much higher labor and living costs"spends more per person on health care. In 2006, Medicare spent fifteen thousand dollars per enrollee here, almost twice the national average. The income per capita is twelve thousand dollars. In other words, Medicare spends three thousand dollars more per person here than the average person earns."
Gawande explores similar markets with different numbers, and looks into the 'whys'. I found it quite worth reading to the end.

My own vague take is that no reform can really happen until there is some kind of control on these kinds of disparities in functionality and costs.

roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 07:48 pm
@ossobuco,
I read of the situation, though not in New Yorker. Somehow, I'm unsure of the phrase
Quote:
In 2006, Medicare spent fifteen thousand dollars per enrollee here,. . .
Too cynical perhaps, but does that mean they paid claims in the amount of $15.000.00? Could the figure be what was paid to HMOs with a group in a very high risk classification, i.e. very old? I recall that the total premium for the health insurance I had while employed ran a bit over $7,000.00 per month per employee, and that was a fairly youthful and healthy population. An area in which the general retired population is older than the average age of retirees is going to have higher premiums.

I'm naturally suspicious of general numbers from people with points to prove.

Edit: I meant to say $7,000.00 per year.
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 09:21 pm
@ebrown p,
ebrown p wrote:


My point is that there are some things that work better when the government runs them. I gave several examples including education, fire departments and NASA-- you could add many more to this list-- Interstate highways and the Coast Guard for example.



The point is what is one's definition of "work better"? Work better in your mind may be work worse in another's mind. Remember, we are a heterogenous society with differing levels of concern for our fellow citizens. A national health care system that is ultimately a single payer system is just the medical version of Robin Hood, in my opinion. Very expensive to take care of everyone, so tax the wealthy, and give to the poor.

If national health comes to fruition, I wonder if many of those that will benefit are past the point of gratitude, since I suspect that many believe all are entitled to medical care as part of some God given right. I would hope there would be some that would have some gratitude to the country, since there are countries that have societies that are the back-drops to Slum Dog Millionaire movies.

I suspect that there could be an unsuspected consequence of national health. That might be that people's social identity is threatened, if they have to be in a medical waiting room with people that they previously have insulated themselves from. In other words, neighborhoods may become more class conscious, as opposed to today's urban environment where many classes live within the same radius of some HMO. Going to a private doctor, based on one's better paying private insurance was part of one's social strata. If that is threatened, I would think people will just try to cloister themselves away from those that may now be at the doctor's office that they used to feel privileged in having.

Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 09:24 pm
@Foofie,
ya know, foofie, parts of your post really rub me the wrong way.

just saying...
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 09:40 pm
@Rockhead,
Quote:
ya know, foofie, parts of your post really rub me the wrong way.


Only parts, Rocky? You're far more tolerant than I am.
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 09:44 pm
@Merry Andrew,
his first sentence was ok...

(and he uses the quote function nicely)
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 10:15 pm
@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:

ya know, foofie, parts of your post really rub me the wrong way.

just saying...


Which means what? You do not like my insight? It might be quite true for some people. True, I might rub many people the wrong way (for them), since I usually do not pander to people's sensitivities. I accept MY social pariah status in some circles. This has not had a negative effect on my self-esteem. I hope my insight has not really bothered you, since it was not directed at you at all. But, if you insist on taking my post personally, I guess that is your right.
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 10:25 pm
@Foofie,
i think it's a good thing you are a rich snob, because you would So not like it if we were neighbors...

have a nice life.
revel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 07:37 am
I have to admit that there are some conservative activitivist who seem to becoming unhinged since Obama has become president.

Local Fox Reporter Attends Town Hall And Finds ‘Some Attendees Admit They Don’t Live In The District’



YAF organizer kicks progressive intern out of right-wing conference: ‘Why don’t you move to Canada?’
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 07:53 am
@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:

i think it's a good thing you are a rich snob, because you would So not like it if we were neighbors...

have a nice life.


Where did you get the idea I am rich? And, you are confusing snobbery for my willingness to not be alienated from the social strata in this society that might find me anathema. In other words, I have no desire to take over this society, and change it for my self-serving needs. I can accept the status quo better than most people, perhaps, since I have a thick skin.

I do not expect to have a nice life, since there are so many people of mediocre intellect where I live. That is the bane of educated secular Jews like myself that must live amongst the mediocre, since the truly elite find me and my ilk pariahs of sorts. Any pity you can spare will be appreciated.
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 10:07 am
@Foofie,
the status quo is strangling rural America.

had an interesting thought...(hmmm...)

the house down the road from me is up for sale, can be purchased for less than a new Escalade (no clunker rebate available)

you would have to be a very quiet obnoxious secular jew if you was to live here long...
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 03:27 pm
@Thomas,
JSM wrote:
Quote:
Lord, enlighten thou our enemies, sharpen their wits, give acuteness to their perceptions, and consecutiveness and clearness to their reasoning powers: we are in danger from their folly, not from their wisdom; their weakness is what fills us with apprehension, not their strength.


Quote:
Man I like John Stuart Mill!


Me too, Thomas, me too!
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  2  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:07 pm
Here we go... why not get political advantage from all this.


DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:33 pm
@revel,
Quote:
The attendee continued, “This is a free country, but I think there’s a certain degree of respect” required. “I won’t be quiet! I won’t sit down! And I won’t let this happen on my watch,” responded the angry conservative activist.


"i won't be quiet" - course not. yer being paid to go there and be a disruptive a-hole.

"i won't sit down!" - and yet, there he is; sitiing down while being a disruptive a-hole. do you think he shakes his head when he says "yes" ?

"and i won't let this happen on my watch!" - and who's timeclock are you taking that watch on, mr. professional disruptive a-hole? sure as hell ain't mine sonny boy.






0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 04:45 pm
@ebrown p,
"why are yooooo ignoring his birth certificate??" - because even Townhall.com acknowledges the validity of his birth certificate.


The real question is; "why did people like her ignore the incompetence of the bush administration?
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 05:41 pm
@roger,
That's not the differentiation. Gawande is a careful writer. I'm reluctant to summarize a fairly complex article.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Aug, 2009 06:39 pm
@Rockhead,
You should make the offer to someone that is truly deserving. I am not.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/07/2024 at 05:51:20