Letty has a related thread going, dealing with Razanne, a modestly dressed Muslim doll.
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13461
In the '60's I was passionately and vocally against the Barbie Doll. I even tried to boycott other Matel products when I was shopping for boy toys. Barbie represented frivolous, brainless womanhood with an unrealistic figure and an impractical wardrobe.
Two years ago a fringe member of Mr. Noddy's family, invited us to a birthday party for a four-year-old. Barbies were specified as the only acceptable gift.
I mentioned this double affront (assigned
Barbies! to my daughter-in-law who retorted that she and her friends had loved playing Barbies and their Barbies had all sorts of adventures. Like G.I. Joe, Barbie was an action doll.
For years I've read about Barbie inspiring anorexia in sensitive teenagers.
If this is so, why are 66% American's overweight?
As a dear, sweet, little old lady in tennis shoes, my primary objection to Barbie these days is the shoddy quality of her clothes and accessories. Also, while I haven't checked, I suspect Barbie's wardrobe and artifacts are made in sweatshops overseas.
I'm against the loving parents who buy the new Barbies, year after year, for their daughters and store them up high, unplayed with to preserve their value as collector's items.
Mature wisdom: Barbie's value is in the eye of the beholder. I can't imagine that the Sozlet lives in a world where dressing and undressing are the most fascinating parts of her day and dressing and undressing are the only play activities she can some up with--ever.