1
   

assume vs presume

 
 
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2003 05:15 am
When to use one when to use the other.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 5,771 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2003 06:27 am
The terms are synonomous. Both refer to accepting things as fact without proof.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2003 06:29 am
The only difference is that 'assume' has better pun value, as it makes an 'ass out of u and me' Laughing
0 Replies
 
Wy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2003 01:21 pm
M-W.com sez that to accept without proof is a definition of presume, but it's third on the list. First is to undertake without permission, or DARE. Second definition for presume is to expect or assume with confidence... and after accept without proof is to take for granted.

Assume means primarily to take up, or use; second definition, to undertake; third, to take control of. Not until the fourth definition do you get to "to pretend to have or be." Later in the list are: to take as granted or true, and to take over someone's debts as your own.

So they're not quite the same, and neither is listed as a synonym for the other. Idiomatically, I'd use assume for, well, assumptions: "I assume dinner will be ready when we get there." I'd save presume for a more negative use: "He presumed that we'd welcome him with open arms, but we shut the door in his face."
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » assume vs presume
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/08/2024 at 05:01:25