13
   

SOCIALISM FOR AMERICA....ITS TIME!!!

 
 
Amigo
 
  2  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 08:06 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
Your wish is Obama's command.


Power has not changed hands and the agenda is intact. The two party illusion is a Necessity. There is only one party. Follow the money.

hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 08:08 pm
@Amigo,
Quote:
There is only one party. Follow the money.


Yes, the robber barons have done very well for themselves. Americans are idiots, they don't even know when they are being taken for a ride.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 08:10 pm
@ossobuco,
I know you do.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 08:11 pm
@Amigo,
Quote:
Power has not changed hands and the agenda is intact. The two party illusion is a Necessity. There is only one party. Follow the money.


Wow - that sounds deep, but what does it mean?
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 08:14 pm
@ossobuco,
osso could be our apologist...every socialist government needs an apologist
soozoo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 08:34 pm
Amigo, if that definition was meant for me, I know what socialism is. I'm still against it.
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 08:35 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
The energy combined by the "Left" and "Right" is enough to reform the government. The government is not left wing or right wing. Government is ultimatly and by its nature totalitarian.

Bush with the support of the right wing will give the government the Patriot act.Obama with the support of the left wing will narrow the pratice of the 2nd amendment. This is the "Left" and the "Right" working together in the government to concentrate the resources, land and wealth into fewer and fewer hands.
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 08:42 pm
@soozoo,
Quote:
Amigo, if that definition was meant for me, I know what socialism is. I'm still against it.
It was meant for anybody and everybody. The counter to capitalism is non existent. Most Americans can't even tell a very simple definition of what socialism is.

So....Here it is.

Why are you against it?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  2  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 08:50 pm


Socialism wrongfully suppresses the need and desire humans have to be exceptional.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 08:56 pm
@panzade,
I'm not an apologist. I'm way over Ortega, much less Chavez. I was for the Sandanistas, in the day. I've interest in euro socialism, a different bag of beans, but am not smart on the details.

I apologia pro vita sua for no one. I may describe my own quandaries.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 09:03 pm
@ossobuco,
Oh, I get it is some kind of sin to understand Finn for seconds at a time.
And another to question, say, Chavez.
Eh.
lastmixradio
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 09:09 pm
No...?
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 09:29 pm
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Socialism wrongfully suppresses the need and desire humans have to be exceptional.


Let's say Old man McPherson had takle shop on Main. He worked there when he was a kid when his grandfather owned it and now he owned it and his son worked there and he planned for his son to own it. But then Wallmart moved in and now old man McPherson works for Walmart and his son is a cashier for Wallmart and his sons son will work for Wallmart.

And Joe from "Joes Garage" works for Walmart and Lisa from "Lisas linin" works for Walmart and all the people in China are locked in Walmart factories and everybody is working for **** and they never own **** till there dead working for Walmart.

Who exactly is living exceptional?

Where does all the Walmart money go?

Who makes all this **** for walmart?
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 09:46 pm
@Amigo,
Oh, woe is me, on this one I can see the point of h20 guy.

In the meantime, you're splathering, Amigo.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  2  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 09:59 pm
@Amigo,
Socialists get to own shops? Who knew? Sounds like there was some inherited wealth being transferred down the family line in a good ole capitalist fashion.

Amigo, I'm not a fan of Walmart by any means but socialism isn't a better answer.
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 10:09 pm
@Amigo,
Quote:
The energy combined by the "Left" and "Right" is enough to reform the government. The government is not left wing or right wing. Government is ultimatly and by its nature totalitarian.


That makes it sound like you're more interested in anarchy than socialism, Amigo. I think I understand where you're coming from, but have you thought this out clearly?
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 10:09 pm
@JPB,
I posted with ambiguity and was soon denounced. Very silly.

Really, may the bird of paradise pull your eyelashes.
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 10:10 pm
@JPB,
This is a new kind of socialism.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 10:12 pm
@ossobuco,
I have no idea what you're talking about, osso.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Jun, 2009 10:15 pm
@ossobuco,
Oh, wait, that wasn't to jpb, eek, but to amigo.
Sorry, jpb. A messup.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 09:16:08