1
   

Getting the insurance industry out of the health care system

 
 
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2003 08:38 am
The only way to achieve an medically and cost effective health care plan is to immediately change the method of payment to health care providers. The first step would be to stop using the term "health insurance" and start referring to it as "Health Care." The insurance Industry must be removed from participation or it will never work. It was Hillary Clinton's attempt to control the insurance industry that doomed her maiden effort during Bill Clinton's first term.

I have over 10 years of experience exploring how to change the US health care delivery system. I have watched everything that my Union employer tried to alert the health care professions and the public during the 1970s and 80s about HMOs and other provider group forms and the effect it would have on the quality and scope of health care. It was so difficult to try to make everyone recognize what was happening, much less prepare to do anything about it to avoid the disaster we are now in.

The only thing that will work is a not-for-profit single-payer health care system that does not include the insurance industry. It will be difficult enough to control the profit motives of the hospital industry.

Until we get the for-profit parties out of the health care system, the conditions we now face will only get worse. The insurance industry will fight to the death to prevent this from happening because they earn huge amounts of money by controlling health care through employer and private health insurance plans. They always cry "poor mouth" about their costs, but its a scam on the public.

If we get the insurance companies out of the picture and convert to a single payer system, it will help small employers as well as large, and everyone will have access to health care services.

I could go on and on, but this is getting too long and I'm getting riled up in frustration over the greed that has caused this situation.

BumbleBeeBoogie
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 787 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
the prince
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2003 08:45 am
When I see issues like this, sometimes I wonder why are places like India called the "Third World"...

(and pls this is not a discussion abt poverty...)

India's 'five-star' hospitals
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2003 09:02 am
Gautam
Gautam, thanks so much for the Indian hospital article. Amazing but not surprising. India's dedication to high quality education is having a tremendous impact on it's status in the world in all the sciences.

BumbleBeeBoogie
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2003 10:20 am
Another charm of insurance-based health care: office surgery
HEALTH HAZARDS OF OFFICE-BASED SURGERY (Health & Medicine)
US News and World Reports - 9/30/03

"We don't have effective ways of monitoring all that happens within a doctor's office."
-- James Thompson, president of the Federation of State Medical Boards

Usually people visit a doctor's office to get better. But a number of people are getting worse--even dying--from things that happen in those offices. A study in the latest Archives of Surgery finds that the risk of serious injury or death is 10 times as high in a doctor's office as in an ambulatory surgery center, a free-standing clinic for outpatients.

Surgery and complicated diagnostic tests in a doctor's office carry heightened risks:

http://www.you-click.net/GoNow/a15504a86786a170716372a4
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2003 11:04 am
Boiling Brew: Politics and Health Insurance Gap
September 30, 2003
Boiling Brew: Politics and Health Insurance Gap
By ROBIN TONER - New york Times

WASHINGTON, Sept. 29 ?- The jump in the number of Americans without health insurance is not just another bad economic statistic.

Health care costs are soaring again, after several years of stability; average premiums rose nearly 14 percent this year, the third year of double-digit increases, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Employers are pushing more of the costs onto their workers, raising co-payments and deductibles. At the same time, many Americans saw their health benefits jeopardized by layoffs, which have continued despite the official end of the recession in November 2001.

In such times, the plight of the uninsured becomes more of a middle-class issue, more of a symbol of real close-to-home insecurity and thus more politically potent, advocates and experts say. Until now, "it's mainly been an issue of altruism for a discrete and disadvantaged population," said Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, a liberal consumer group.

"Now that the losses in health coverage are impacting more middle-class and working families," Mr. Pollack said, "this issue becomes one of self-interest for a very substantial part of the population."

Even before the Census Bureau announced the numbers, showing that the number of uninsured Americans had risen by 2.4 million last year, to 43.6 million, most of the major Democratic presidential candidates were campaigning hard on the problems in health care. Not since the 1992 election has the issue drawn so much attention, and the reasons are not hard to find.

For Democrats, it is a powerful symbol of a sluggish economy, of a lack of federal money to deal with domestic problems because of the deficit and the war in Iraq and of what they say is the Bush administration's insensitivity to the needs of the home front. It could, in short, be a significant vulnerability for President Bush ?- if the Democrats succeed in framing this election as a referendum on domestic policy.

Republicans argue that the administration has several major initiatives on the table to deal with the problems of cost and access to health care, from its Medicare prescription drug plan to legislation that would cap jury awards in medical malpractice lawsuits.

"If Democrats are seen as obstructing that process, that could be a significant problem for them politically," said Christine Iverson, a spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee.

The Bush administration has also proposed in the past to expand coverage to the uninsured through the use of tax credits to help them buy insurance. Still, some experts say the administration will eventually have to offer a broader vision on health care as an alternative to the Democrats.

In fact, Americans place the health care issue high on the political agenda, based on recent polls. A CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll last week found that a candidate's position on health care was cited as "extremely important" by 43 percent of Americans, just below terrorism (cited by 49 percent) and the economy (49 percent), and well above the environment (30 percent) and taxes (36 percent.)

An NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll in July found that health care costs ranked at the top of Americans' economic concerns, cited by 24 percent, compared with 16 percent who cited high taxes.

Most of the major Democratic candidates have produced a major plan to expand health coverage, generally financing it by rolling back all or part of Mr. Bush's tax cuts. But Republican strategists are quick to point out that the politics of health care are complicated and that the candidate with the biggest plan is not always rewarded.

The classic example, of course, is President Bill Clinton, who ran on the promise of universal health care only to see his actual plan for national health insurance turn into a political and legislative debacle. Critics said that plan would cost more, create a huge new government bureaucracy and give many Americans poorer health coverage than they already had.

Given the Democrats' reliance on using the tax cut to finance a health care plan, Republicans are very likely to make a version of that argument again. Bill McInturff, a Republican pollster and expert on public opinion and health, said, "A lot of 2004 will be a fight about who is perceived to pay versus who is perceived to get the benefit." In the past, Mr. McInturff said, when middle-income voters sensed they were being asked to pay more so that others received health care, "political paralysis has happened."

Still, he added: "People still don't get how big an issue this will be. The numbers and the state of the economy and the relationship between the cost of care and what's happened to the uninsured will be addressed in the 2004 campaign cycle, because it's what people care about."

The problems in the health care system are related to nearly every issue bubbling domestically, from unemployment to the fiscal crisis in the states. Moreover, even if employment begins to pick up ?- and new estimates will be released on Friday ?- nobody is expecting a speedy turnaround in the problems of health care costs and coverage.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Immortality and Doctor Volkov - Discussion by edgarblythe
Sleep Paralysis - Discussion by Nick Ashley
On the edge and toppling off.... - Discussion by Izzie
Surgery--Again - Discussion by Roberta
PTSD, is it caused by a blow to the head? - Question by Rickoshay75
THE GIRL IS ILL - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Getting the insurance industry out of the health care system
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/09/2026 at 12:10:27