62
   

Can you look at this map and say Israel does not systemically appropriate land?

 
 
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Wed 13 May, 2015 07:34 pm
@oralloy,
Is that to keep the Jews in or the Christians out?
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 May, 2015 10:28 pm
@neologist,
Quote:
What/who were the forces behind it?


Of the many places, two were very strong contenders, the west coast of Tasmania and Rhodesia . Rhodesia was considered because the Zimbabwe ruins were Jewish in origin and there were black Jewish people in the area but it was dependent on the Pan-African Railway that never materialised .

This left Tasmania and it was set in motion to create the Jewish state there but it hadnt gone far when WW2 broke out . After the war, the United States set about destroying the British Empire and its trade power .

Between Britain and the USA, under the guise of the UN, it was decided to form Israel where it is now . Note all of these places under consideration were a part of the British Commonwealth or Empire . There has always been strong Jewish sentiment in Britain till recently when it seems they are now favouring the Palestinians .

So it would seem the two main forces were USA trade interests in weakening Britain and British pro-Jewish sentiment .
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Wed 13 May, 2015 10:41 pm
@InfraBlue,
Quote:
Israel shouldn't be secured. Israel should be dismantled, it's leadership prosecuted for the oppression of the Palestinian peoples, and replaced by a truly democratic, egalitarian and pluralistic state that serves the interests of all of the peoples of Palestine.

The endeavor to preserve Israel as a "Jewish state" is informed by ethnocentric nationalist ideologies that originated in Europe during the 19th century. It's most grotesque manifestation was the Nazi nationalism of Germany during the mid twentieth century. Israel's supporters cling to these ethnocentric nationalist notions as they hold out for Israel's ethnic purity and their rejection of the Palestinian's Right of Return.
This is the big attraction for Nazi/anti-Jewish sentiment whose proponents say they only support Palestine, they dont really hate Jews .

Demolish Israel . Rolling Eyes Laughable for its sheer stupidity but it makes them feel powerful and vindictive which goes some way to alleviating the hate that festers in them .

After WW2 and before "Nazi, Jewish-Hating, pro-Palestinian Skin Heads" like you became fashionable, Israel was attacked time and time again . Where were you then ?
neologist
 
  2  
Reply Wed 13 May, 2015 10:52 pm
@Ionus,
I wasn't asking about alternate places. I was referring to the forces driving them to Palestine. It is a strongly held belief among nominal christians that Jews must inhabit their ancestral land for Jesus to return. A belief which bolsters support even to this day.
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 May, 2015 11:14 pm
@neologist,
Yes and I think I gave the two main reasons for Israel where it is, the fundamental Christian belief of which you refer occurred AFTER the formation of Israel .
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 May, 2015 11:28 pm
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:
Yes and I think I gave the two main reasons for Israel where it is, the fundamental Christian belief of which you refer occurred AFTER the formation of Israel .
Christian Zionism @ wikipedia
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 May, 2015 11:35 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Why do I get the impression you want to say something ? Ideas come and go, show me a direct linkage fromWW2 fundamental Christianity to the forming of Israel . Dont forget to factor in the anti-Jewish sentiment of a lot of Christian Churches, and explain why the pro-Jewish won the day as you suggest .
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 May, 2015 11:49 pm
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:
Why do I get the impression you want to say something ?
I don't know anything which could give me a sound basis to answer that question.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  0  
Reply Thu 14 May, 2015 09:29 am
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:

Why do I get the impression you want to say something ? Ideas come and go, show me a direct linkage fromWW2 fundamental Christianity to the forming of Israel . Dont forget to factor in the anti-Jewish sentiment of a lot of Christian Churches, and explain why the pro-Jewish won the day as you suggest .


If I may offer my thoughts, perhaps, it gave the pro-Israel churches an identity that made them antithetical to the anti-Israel churches, which could be a value for one's identity and self-esteem? The pro-Israel schtick is based on believing that the Covenant with "the children of Israel" was not replaced when Jesus came on board to monotheistic theology, while anti-Israel schtick just said the Covenant with the "children of Israel" was replaced when Jesus' came on the scene. This being Catholic theology, if I understand it, made Jews "expendable," so the Holocaust was a non-sequitor to many a good Catholic, after WWII. It also allowed German Catholics to assuage any possible guilt/remorse for acting like blonde beasts. The American Evangelical churches have a need to differentiate themselves from liberal Protestant and Catholic churches to get converts. Loving Israel helps. Nothing like being different to assert one's identity. The above is just my opinion, based on what I have observed/heard/read. Take it or leave it.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Thu 14 May, 2015 09:46 am
@Foofie,
What beverage has been in that bottle the ghost came out and told you that, Foofie?
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 May, 2015 09:50 am
@Foofie,
Quote:
Catholic theology, if I understand it, made Jews "expendable,"
Catholic theology has never said Jews were expendable . Secular rulers with a predetermined outcome have had a passing glance at some aspects of the Bible . It is beyond doubt that Jesus was crucified by the Romans and was a Jew . Theology would be concerned with what his life and death meant rather than who or what killed him .

Quote:
German Catholics to assuage any possible guilt/remorse for acting like blonde beasts
German Catholics have not assuaged their guilt . It is still visible today in a generation not even responsible . As for blonde hair, the greatest portion of blonde hair and blue eyes is in the British population who were not only Nazi Europe's enemy the longest, but also were one of the main instigators of the creation of the Jewish state . The Nazi movement was definitely not only German but was world wide, including the USA .

Quote:
The American Evangelical churches have a need to differentiate themselves from liberal Protestant and Catholic churches to get converts.
Many of the Evangelical Churches can remember Churches being burnt, and Blacks , Jews and Catholics being murdered by so called Protestant KKK members . It isnt about converts .
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 May, 2015 10:35 am
@Ionus,
Two words:
Balfour Declaration
Olivier5
 
  3  
Reply Thu 14 May, 2015 01:12 pm
A self-appointed group of European ex-ministers wrote a letter to current EU foreign ministers about the I/P conflict, urging them to get involved.

I am not personally convince that anything can be done through peaceful means, but the letter does capture the European left view of the situation very well. There is a section on the relationship with the US which is more candid than these things often are:

Quote:
The EU relationship with the US

The EU and its Member States have been held back from a more proactive stance on Israel/Palestine by three major considerations: their lack of consensus on the issue, their focus on newer and apparently more urgent Middle East crises and their reluctance to get out in front of the United States in an area where Washington has always insisted on prime ownership. These three drawbacks now need to be addressed directly. The absence of any credible negotiation process, combined with the desperate condition of the Occupied Territories, the eroding international legitimacy of the Israeli approach and the instability of the wider region, requires a fresh examination of EU policy. The fact that American efforts over more than two decades have achieved virtually nothing by way of justice for the Palestinians or long-term security for Israel means that European interests have also suffered. This needs to be recognised in a new formulation of EU policy that puts those interests first and that reflects the expectation of European public opinion increasingly dissatisfied with the status quo. The Arab Peace Initiative, proposed in 2002 but largely ignored since then, could form one pillar of a new EU approach.




http://static.guim.co.uk/ni/1431517700142/EEPG-letter.pdf
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 May, 2015 02:09 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:
I am not personally convince that anything can be done through peaceful means, but the letter does capture the European left view of the situation very well.
The majority (if not all) of members of the European Eminent Persons Group are Conservatives/Christian Democrats.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 May, 2015 03:11 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Really? The French signatories are all socialist (Rocard, Vedrine etc.).
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Thu 14 May, 2015 06:53 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:
I am not personally convince that anything can be done through peaceful means,

There is certainly nothing to be done militarily. The United States will protect Israel from any aggression. The Palestinians' only option was the peace process.

I also understand that these new trade pacts that the United States is negotiating with Asia and Europe will explicitly outlaw boycotts against Israel.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 May, 2015 09:21 pm
@neologist,
That was the Declaration of one political party of one country during a particular time which had a very defined political goal . Creating the Israeli state was a means, if the end moved then the means would be abandoned . How does that contradict anything I said ?
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 May, 2015 10:42 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

InfraBlue wrote:
Israel shouldn't be secured. Israel should be dismantled, it's leadership prosecuted for the oppression of the Palestinian peoples, and

Sorry Adolf. Not going to happen.

It should happen.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Reply Thu 14 May, 2015 10:50 pm
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:

Quote:
Israel shouldn't be secured. Israel should be dismantled, it's leadership prosecuted for the oppression of the Palestinian peoples, and replaced by a truly democratic, egalitarian and pluralistic state that serves the interests of all of the peoples of Palestine.

The endeavor to preserve Israel as a "Jewish state" is informed by ethnocentric nationalist ideologies that originated in Europe during the 19th century. It's most grotesque manifestation was the Nazi nationalism of Germany during the mid twentieth century. Israel's supporters cling to these ethnocentric nationalist notions as they hold out for Israel's ethnic purity and their rejection of the Palestinian's Right of Return.
This is the big attraction for Nazi/anti-Jewish sentiment whose proponents say they only support Palestine, they dont really hate Jews .

Demolish Israel . Rolling Eyes Laughable for its sheer stupidity but it makes them feel powerful and vindictive which goes some way to alleviating the hate that festers in them .

After WW2 and before "Nazi, Jewish-Hating, pro-Palestinian Skin Heads" like you became fashionable, Israel was attacked time and time again . Where were you then ?

There is nothing Nazi/anti-Jewish about that sentiment. You're conflating Zionism, which I am against, with Judaism.

Demolishing Israel and replacing it with a truly democratic, egalitarian and pluralistic state that serves all of the peoples of Palestine isn't hateful. It's the epitome of philanthropy.

There is nothing "Nazi, Jewish-Hating, Skin Head" about me. These people are hardly pro-Palestinian. The Zionists share the same ethnocentric ideological roots with the Nazis, Jew-haters and Skin Heads.
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 May, 2015 10:56 pm
@InfraBlue,
Lets assume you are right . How do we demolish Israel ? At least my option is do-able . If your option is not practical, then why be an exponent of it ?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
"Progressives(TM)" and Israel - Discussion by gungasnake
Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Abbas Embraces the Islamists - Discussion by Advocate
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 07:49:44