63
   

Can you look at this map and say Israel does not systemically appropriate land?

 
 
Advocate
 
  2  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 02:46 pm
Big deal!!!!! I would like to see you guys wear suicide belts.
Advocate
 
  1  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 02:46 pm
Big deal!!!!! I would like to see you guys wear suicide belts.
djjd62
 
  0  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 02:51 pm
@Advocate,
you first.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  0  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 02:51 pm
@Advocate,
you first.
JTT
 
  0  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 02:56 pm
@djjd62,
How do you guys do it? I mean, there's a highly redundant, but pretty funny nevertheless, warning that one is double posting. Is the warning just that? Can it be ignored with just one more simple click of the cursor?
JTT
 
  0  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 03:02 pm
@Advocate,
Quote:
Big deal!!!!! I would like to see you guys wear suicide belts.


That would definitely preclude further, their speaking out.

I've always been puzzled, nay perplexed, flummoxed, Advocate, how you can advocate that the dirty dealings of the US should be held up to scrutiny, but you want to give Israel a pass on everything.

It's schizophrenic is what it is!
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 03:02 pm
@Advocate,
Bube!
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 03:03 pm
@Advocate,

Bube!
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  2  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 03:03 pm
@JTT,
i'm guessing that advocates was a glitch, as for me, the second post i didn't add the period, thus allowing the post to go through, then i edited the period back in, effectively baffling the hamsters
talk72000
 
  1  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 03:10 pm
dvd : Quest for the Phoenicians, National Geographics.

Quote:
Canaanites & Phoenician as they are the same genetically


http://www.geneticarchaeology.com/research/Quest_For_The_Phoenicians.asp
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 05:13 pm
@djjd62,
Quote:
then i edited the period back in,


I want to discuss this, forever.

Was that a good edit? Or maybe more importantly, can one actually consider it to have been an edit at all?

Moreover, what do the hamsters have to say on this issue and how much weight should be given to what the hamsters say?
djjd62
 
  2  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 05:17 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

Quote:
then i edited the period back in,


I want to discuss this, forever.

Was that a good edit? Or maybe more importantly, can one actually consider it to have been an edit at all?
maybe we should invite parados in on this Wink
Moreover, what do the hamsters have to say on this issue and how much weight should be given to what the hamsters say?
i respect the hamsters, but they need to be challenged now and again
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  2  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 05:48 pm
@JTT,
The charges against Israel are lies. It is as simple as that. E. g., most here condemned Israel for its invasion of Gaza. The truth is that Israel's invasion took place after at least 8,000 missiles and shells were fired into Israel, not to mention the killing and kidnapping of soldiers in Israel. Moreover, Israel killed a very small number of Hamas soldiers, when it could have killed hundreds of thousands in Gaza.

Had Canada fired 10 missiles into the USA, we would have invaded in force.

Setanta
 
  1  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 05:53 pm
@Advocate,
Who here (let alone "most") has referred to the Israeli invasion of Gaza? Don't make **** up, Bubba, your case is weak enough as it is. Among the "very small number of Hamas soldiers," how many civilians--including women and children--died in Gaza? Are you really not aware of how biased your view is?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 06:04 pm
@Advocate,
If they are lies, why are most reliable media sources so consistent in their reporting of the Israeli atrocities? Are they all liars?
failures art
 
  0  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 07:33 pm
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:

The charges against Israel are lies. It is as simple as that.

Except they aren't. They have created a police state.

Advocate wrote:

Had Canada fired 10 missiles into the USA, we would have invaded in force.

If we wanted to invade Canada, we wouldn't have to wait for missiles to be fired.

A
R
T
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 07:36 pm
@failures art,
While in Israel some years ago, the Israeli's had check points on most of the roads - especially the road that ran close to Jordan. Yes, they were armed.

Why is it that people like Advocate uses their great imagination about the US-Canada invasion when that issue doesn't even come close to what Israel does in Palestine - for real.
Foofie
 
  2  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 08:21 pm
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


Quote:
God bless your empathy; unfortunately it prevents you from minding your own bloody business.


To that, Pastor Niemoller's oft-quoted homily comes to mind.

Quote:
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialist
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me



I will speak out for the Palestinians


Please! You are embarrassing me. Do you not see that "they came for the Jews" and no one spoke out. So, the recalcitrance that may be perceived, by those that have empathy for the Palestineans, is nothing but the surviving generations of Jews saying not again. It is just cause and effect. Exterminate Jews, and those that survive will develop a culture of survival, even if it is on a small plot of land that no one else (in modern times) really had much interest in, until Jews thought it could be a safe haven.

You should find a better quote, in my opinion.
failures art
 
  0  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 08:27 pm
@Foofie,
The Nazi's rounded up the Roma people too. They still have no land. Since Israel is a great idea to resolve the travels of nomadic people, I guess Israel would be perfect! Perhaps Israel should surrender some of their land so the Roma can have a country of their own!

Or is it only a good idea when it's not your land that's being taken.

A
R
T
Foofie
 
  2  
Mon 1 Nov, 2010 08:27 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

If they are lies, why are most reliable media sources so consistent in their reporting of the Israeli atrocities? Are they all liars?


In a world that loves to see what Jews are "up to," it helps newspapers/tv media, etc. maintain their audiences. Plus, media has a habit of reflecting their audience. In the nineteenth century, American Indians were not treated by the media the same way they are treated by the media today.

Notice the newspaper headlines during WWII. What word was acceptable for "Japanese"?
 

Related Topics

Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
"Progressives(TM)" and Israel - Discussion by gungasnake
Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Abbas Embraces the Islamists - Discussion by Advocate
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 07:57:39