sex study paragraph that caught my eye

And what is 'sociosexuality'? Meaningless terms for meaningless conclusions.

For every cheating wife, there's a cheatee - usually married too.


I hold that if someone came up with a super-cheap, super-accurate DIY test for paternity that involved saliva, the institution of 'marriage' would disappear under the weight of the divorce proceedings. Damn quick.

i dont know if its las vegas, or everywhere.

every married woman i know who has one of those husbands who does whatever shes says, whipped, is cheating on him. my friends girl i think was hitting on me one night, i was like umm ok, ignored her, then his BEST friend got with her.

and he hates ME! hes like i know guys dude theres no way u didnt f*** her. hah, sad really but eh. lifes tough sometimes.

has me sorta jaded about the whole relationship thing..

damn,

yes, women cheat.
I would almost guess the the number of cheating women is higher then the number of cheating men.

Women... just dont brag about it

thats the first rule i learned about girls, never kiss and tell.

theres all these sterotypes, but most of them are opposite or just false.

guys are the dogs who go out and cheat, righttttt!!!

well, you cant just say it is men. Who are they cheating with ya know?
It isnt the same 5 people in the entire world.

for some reason, I guess.. people just dont expect the married WOMAN to cheat. Just the man.

Women are not evolved to be faithful to one man. Any scientist will tell you that. From an evolutionary point of view it is a perversion. Christianity is a perversion which keeps the untrammelled indulgence of the sensual appetites in check so that the elite don't rot. And it hasn't a great record either. It clings on by the skin of its teeth. That's why you insist on a lack of evidence of engaging in untrammelled indulgence of the sensual appetites in your elected representatives. Even mild versions.

It's the funniest thing in the world watching these marrieds promoting evolution theory in schools and at the meetings all the women dressed sexual display style because it is considered anti-social for them to display biologically. Hence the female beautification industry which is VERY VERY large.

But they are getting there if the pub on Sat. night is anything to go by and it is compared with pubs of the "sound money" era. Or one might compare Oscar ceremonies across the years in terms of the year and of difference between the men and women at those ceremonies. We men are denied in this regard. It is most unfair is what I think. It must be great getting all glammed up. It must be rotten though to get glammed for the social market-place and then sit with the hubby all night listening to him wittering about something or other that casts him in a heroic light.

That's Christianity for you. And I'm in favour. Or I have been since I finally got it into my head that they were all the same with a bag over their heads like the Head of Research had always told me. It's a money saver you see and that allows investment in plant, machinery and tools and there we go up to, the best yet, Heidi Whatshername losing her handbag in space. She was probably up there for other reasons and had done the fingers in the hair stuff and the "Oh, please please Mr Captain I've always wanted to do a space walk"

One close friend of mine "always wanted to do a parachute jump". I told her not to be so silly many,many times and argued about how Greenpeace was holding us back because they are all wet liberals and are frightened of any daring moves. Greenpeace was the sponsor. They had put a leaflet through her door. That's what kicked it off. She'd got four sponsors before I heard about it so I lost the argument. I refused to drive her the 70 miles to the gig. "You're on your own with this babe," I told her firmly.

She crocked her knee and was on crutches for four weeks which was exceedingly tiresome and had three operations, for one of which the Australian surgeons had had her Mons Veronis shaved. I found that funny. She gave me a show on a visit to the ward. But it was stubble by the time she got back. And you could forget about the later chapters of the Kama Sutra thereafter and forever and ever. In damp weather everything after No 1.

It did strike me at one time that she might have got the idea of always wanting to do a parachute jump during her periods of wanton self-indulgence.

I prefer my own sex studies to those you read about. They are all done by a load of puritans on a vicarious sex trip in my opinion. Anybody who thinks men are more prone to cheating, biologically, than women has been reading too many of those things.

The main reason women want to go to work is to have men both making up to them and making them. For a scientific evelotionist only the women in the sex industry make any sense.

Awhile back I noticed a study that claims that while men used to cheat much more often than women (presumably meaning that multible men used the same sluts), now the number is about equal. Most cheating that women do is with men that they work with or meet at work, women being in the workplace in greater numbers than ever before is what is said to be driving the women cheater numbers up.

I forgot to mention that the intrepid parachutist eventually admitted that the chaps in the aeroplane had had to prise her fingers loose from the struts holding the wing in place and had thrown her out at 8,000 feet. The ground had come very suddenly she said which is a good thing because if she's seen it coming she would have pulled her feet up and gone in arse first. Crocked arses are the pits.

She had some photos of her in the kit. I had some photos of her in other types of kit. The difference was remarkable.

What you should bear in mind hawk is that this is a dynamic situation. You have pointed out a trend and not a static phenomena.

The reason you give is rather coy. No matter the numbers in the workplace, if there is no impulse it won't happen. It is the impulse which is the reason. The workplace is only the opportunity.

The trend points in one direction only. To the loosening of inhibitory forces and the advent of labour saving devices which render a great deal of traditional women's work superfluous and thus no longer an energy sink.

that is the point....women have always had the same impulse to cheat, now they also have the opportunity. Women work along side men, and over time form an emotional connection that leads to a sexual connection. Women usually need the emotional first, and before now they were rarely with a man enough for this to develope. Now that they are they hop into the sack as often as the men do.

But you don't seem to get the point hawk. It's dymamic. On the increase. "As often as men do" is just where we are about now. And it sounds reasonable. What's good for the goose etc. Think 50 years hence if the trend you pointed to continues. By then, if the trend does continue, and teaching evolution theory in schools can do nothing other than accelerate it, it will not even be considered cheating. Being faithful might even be considered naff. What losers have to put up with.

You have fallen into thinking the world is only as you see it in your life. In fact it has direction.

I think "hop" quite witty though.

[img]well, you cant just say it is men. Who are they cheating with ya know?
It isnt the same 5 people in the entire world.[/img]

well, yes, in fact it is.

They're just very very busy.

Did you not think "hop" was witty then?