California Voters Approve Gay-Marriage Ban

then again, I think it'd brom a biology perspective it makes more sense to say:

IN THE SAME WAY THAT YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE A NONHUMAN TO SUPPORT NONHUMAN'S RIGHTS, YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE GAY TO ...

Well that is the gist of it anyways.

I do not get it. Have you ever met any non humans that agree with this?

He would know what nonhumans are.

What the **** are you going on about?
Does it matter if nonhumans agree, we humans can give right to whoever the hell we want without the thing's permission.

The original proposition does not make sense. Human class is inside the animal class. If you are not an animal, what are you, a ******* prokaryote or a plant? Last I checked plants or prokaryotes don't have the neurological capacity to reasoning logic, or even "support" anything.

This link is NOT for the squeamish.

Very VERY sad...

http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2012/08/months-of-anti-gay-slurs-escalate-into-brutal-attack-on-oklahoma-lesbian/

This is terrible to be hated for simply preferring a same sex partner...

How did a liberal state like California overturn Prop 8

Maybe I have this all wrong but do you think that your life could be at risk exposing truth at times?

If all Christians thought like this one we might all be Christians but if not at least we would be in harmony to some degree.

My life is at more risk not exposing truth...

Rex thank you for be you even when I do not agree with you. By the way, "it is not very often that I disagree with you.

Yes it is very sad and I hope that we may find a cure for this type of behavior because it is not only directed at gays but also heterosexuals, I call this type of behavior complete ignorance.

Following your line of logic there there would be no point having a group called, I don't know, rich jewish new yorkers in support of human rights. BECAUSE RICH JEWISH NEW YORKERS ARE HUMANS ACTUALLY.

You're wilfully bogged down in cladistic literalisms rather than actual meaning.

I can't wait for you to write to ASPCA demanding they take care of homeless people.

Imagine the idiots that actually would entertain this idea...

Now imagine these same idiots voting and being voted into office and then what do you have? Hopefully none in office that believe that but what what they believe may be much worse.

Rex I know you differ than than me on the wikileaks issue but I do think that transparency instead of belief will help us all to have the rights that we are all long overdo.

Please take some time to investigate wikileaks and other issues that are similar just as I had to myself on the gay issue to see clearly. I use to think that homosexuality was wrong because of what I was taught but now I see no true evidence to support that idea.
We are taught that terrorists are such a big threat but I questioned whether there are grater threats and fortunately there are people out there that have proven with evidence and statistics that much of what we worry about is foolishness.