@RexRed,
To be honest, Rex, the issue rarely comes up in English Lit, so you can sleep sound: the kids of Great Britain are safe from my fervent hatred of equality.
I am aware marriage is a civil ceremony, but surely you wouldn't disagree that the status it imposes on a couple - of being husband and wife - is, at it's origins, a religious one, where fidelity is promised for life. Whether you sign the dotted line in a church or registry office you are still signing up to an ancient religious tradition.
If you had remained calm and read my post properly, you would have seen that I am actually all for equality. I said that gay couples should be given all the legal rights of heterosexual married couples. I just don't see the point of the essentially religious ceremony. If it were up to me, I'd get rid of marriage for straight couples too. People should just live together and all have the same rights. This is because I am not part of any religion, Christian or otherwise. I would nevertheless defend the rights of anyone to be a member of a religion, if they so choose, and not deride them for it. As far as I am concerned, however, marriage is for them - religious people. I wouldn't want to usurp their traditions.
I still don't believe gays should be allowed to adopt. Weirdly, my gay friend in Italy concurs, though, as a rider, his reasoning is that gay adoption inflicts upon the child all the prejudice that gays themselves face and is therefore irresponsible. It is that prejudice that should be fought before gays adopting can even be discussed. Our small minded world is not ready for gay adoption.
RexRed wrote...Quote:Also I don't recall you presenting any psychiatric credentials to make the family assessments that you have .
I never pretended to give any...
iamsam82 wrote...Quote:
in my opinion - and that is all it is - the healthiest and most balanced way to raise a child is with a father and mother
As I recall, in an equal society, we are all entitled to an opinion.