@shewolfnm,
shewolfnm wrote:
No. America is not starving. Nor are we destitute enough to where the price of her earrings would make a difference in our economy.. I just find it a bit back handed to spout about financial trouble, yet flaunt your every red cent and expect people to believe you.
It seems to me that the question is whether she was actually flaunting anything or whether the Vanity Fair article is overblown nonsense.
The Vanity Fair article lists huge numbers for the earrings she was wearing ($280,000+ and that is the easily overwhelming majority of the total cost of her outfit that they come up with). Were they really worth that much? Someone might be able to look at the pics and make a reasonable guess at the size of the diamonds but there is more to a diamond than size. AFAIK there isn't any way to determine clarity or imperfections from 20 feet away or a blown up photo.
Ok, so let's stipulate that they are 3 ct. diamonds. What are a pair of 3ct. diamond earrings worth? Well, how about $6,237?
http://www.diamondocean.com/detail.php?pid=6505&mpid=2&metal_info=14-WG&clarity=I2&color=H (That was the 1st link that came up in Google. I didn't even look to see if I could find them cheaper.)
Someone earlier mentioned the big pins that she was wearing as well. Vanity Fair for some reason neglected to include them in their listing. So what are they worth? According to the Boston Herald's coverage of the Vanity Fair story the pins are rhinestone. That'd make them worth what? $40?
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/2008/view.bg?articleid=1117233
Suddenly her $300K outfit is valued at less that $20K and that's still assuming (as Vanity Fair did) that the pearls are real (I can Google "4-strand pearl necklace" and come up with several for under $250... that would bring the total down to under $10K) and that the clothing was an authentic designer label.
So how much of it was Cindy McCain flaunting and how much of it is Vanity Fair blowing smoke?