8
   

Another reason for rational people not to vote for McCain

 
 
cjhsa
 
  0  
Reply Thu 4 Sep, 2008 07:15 am
@Cliff Hanger,
Not nearly as frightening as the alternative. Rockbama is toast, and thank God.

Now, maybe next time, it will be Palin vs. Hillary. Why not? America is then guaranteed a female president.

For all of you who were "laughing" at me and Palin - who's laughing now? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

(told you so)
Gargamel
 
  3  
Reply Thu 4 Sep, 2008 08:38 am
@cjhsa,
cjhsa wrote:

Not nearly as frightening as the alternative. Rockbama is toast, and thank God.

Now, maybe next time, it will be Palin vs. Hillary. Why not? America is then guaranteed a female president.

For all of you who were "laughing" at me and Palin - who's laughing now? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

(told you so)


Tell yourself whatever you need to. You've already posted everywhere how disappointed you are with the Gaytarded Old Party's selection. And so it's obvious you're here just to (continue to) act like a dickhead.

Look, even the Republicans' own consultants know that, in spite of whatever "bounce" McCain gets from the convention, he ain't gonna be president: http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080903/pl_politico/20576

Say it with me, cj, "President Obama."
JPB
 
  2  
Reply Thu 4 Sep, 2008 08:42 am
@Gargamel,
From the pitcher's link..

UPDATE: Noonan tries to explain her remarks, and says that what's "over" isn't, she meant, McCain's campaign, but that what's over is the truth to the belief that "whatever the base of the Republican party thinks is what America thinks."

right....
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  0  
Reply Thu 4 Sep, 2008 03:05 pm
@kickycan,
George Bush
Endorses John McCain

Politics, ‘tis often said,
Doth make some strange bedfellows;
Old angers and hostilities
For winning sake get mellowed.

And so George Bush and John McCain
To no one’s great surprise,
Now hug and join in hopes John wins
The next election prize.

The problem here for John McCain
‘Bout this unseemly flirt
Ain’t that at many times gone by
The Bush team did him dirt.

His problem is Bush policies,
A long litany of dross;
That now hang round poor old John’s neck
Like a two-ton albatross.

********


©2008 Michael Silverstein
TryME
 
  2  
Reply Thu 4 Sep, 2008 03:37 pm
@kickycan,
I don't know I try to evaluate people are more than one criteria. An overall look at motivation, background actions, repeated offense or not but to sum a person up on one thing is just very uncool and so very unwise.

Didn't you know A-O bam man was asked who Christ was and he said Christ was...Didn't you know his stage designer was quoted for using a witches circle for his set design during his convention. You better check out your facts and dig deeper on who all these people are. Or haven't you figured out why their are party members standing up for Mc & P? The information is there if you really care about the country. Or is it just a chance for you to scream no religious people of any kind in governmen? Than dearest person who hasn't looked beyond what is in front of your nose...DON'T VOTE and leave the globe. Cause you can't handle what is really going down in politics or with either candidate. You'd **** your pants.

You just showed the world how really ignorant and unlearned the likes of "your kind" can put in one sentence.

And you showed the world what you don't know jack about the government, those that are elected or the world.

Stop being blind.
TryME
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Sep, 2008 03:38 pm
@Cliff Hanger,
What is more frightening is facts you haven't dug up on the other...yet.
0 Replies
 
TryME
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Sep, 2008 03:52 pm
@kickycan,
I don't know I try to evaluate people are more than one criteria. An overall look at motivation, background actions, repeated offense or not but to sum a person up on one thing is just very uncool and so very unwise.

Didn't you know A-O bam man was asked who Christ was and he said Christ was...Didn't you know his stage designer was quoted for using a witches circle for his set design during his convention. You better check out your facts and dig deeper on who all these people are. Or haven't you figured out why their own party members are standing up for Mc & P? The information is there if you really care about the country. Or is it just a chance for you to scream no religious people of any kind in government? Than dearest person who hasn't looked beyond what is in front of your nose...DON'T VOTE and leave the globe. Cause you can't handle what is really going down in politics or with either candidate. You'd **** your pants.

You just showed the world how really ignorant and unlearned the likes of "your kind" can put in one sentence.

And you showed the world what you don't know jack about the government, those that are elected or the world.

Stop being blind.
Gargamel
 
  3  
Reply Thu 4 Sep, 2008 04:30 pm
@TryME,
TryME wrote:

I don't know I try to evaluate people are more than one criteria. An overall look at motivation, background actions, repeated offense or not but to sum a person up on one thing is just very uncool and so very unwise.

Didn't you know A-O bam man was asked who Christ was and he said Christ was...Didn't you know his stage designer was quoted for using a witches circle for his set design during his convention. You better check out your facts and dig deeper on who all these people are. Or haven't you figured out why their own party members are standing up for Mc & P? The information is there if you really care about the country. Or is it just a chance for you to scream no religious people of any kind in government? Than dearest person who hasn't looked beyond what is in front of your nose...DON'T VOTE and leave the globe. Cause you can't handle what is really going down in politics or with either candidate. You'd **** your pants.

You just showed the world how really ignorant and unlearned the likes of "your kind" can put in one sentence.

And you showed the world what you don't know jack about the government, those that are elected or the world.

Stop being blind.


What in God's name are you talking about?
CalamityJane
 
  2  
Reply Thu 4 Sep, 2008 04:34 pm
@Gargamel,
Don't bother Gargamel - all McCain supporters have consolidated their
brain cells into two and this is the outcome!
Gargamel
 
  2  
Reply Thu 4 Sep, 2008 04:36 pm
@CalamityJane,
It's like someone gave a Capuchin monkey a bible and some feelings.
CalamityJane
 
  2  
Reply Thu 4 Sep, 2008 04:41 pm
@Gargamel,
Gargamel wrote:

It's like someone gave a Capuchin monkey a bible and some feelings.
Laughing

Isn't it rather scary that people with such distorted perception are among us in the 21st century?
Woiyo9
 
  1  
Reply Mon 8 Sep, 2008 07:32 am
@CalamityJane,
Distorted perception of what.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 8 Sep, 2008 07:37 am
@kickycan,
Quote:
Another reason for rational people not to vote for McCain


This pales in comparison to the many, many reasons all of the irrational people are voting for Obama.
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Mon 8 Sep, 2008 12:08 pm
@Gargamel,
This was my first thought also. What the hel is tryme trying to say. maby wyo could paraphrase it in english since he seemed to understand it.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 8 Sep, 2008 12:35 pm
@Debra Law,
What's interesting about this "distraction," is that more men than women think she's qualified as veep. We know how men think with their groins for a "beauty" queen, but this is going too far! LOL
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Reply Mon 8 Sep, 2008 12:37 pm
@cjhsa,
What cjh doesn't seem to realize is that men think Palin is more qualified for veep than women. That nuance is missed by him; no wonder. He's thinking "panties."
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 8 Sep, 2008 04:53 pm
@TryME,
Quote:
I don't know I try to evaluate people are more than one criteria. An overall look at motivation, background actions, repeated offense or not but to sum a person up on one thing is just very uncool and so very unwise.

Didn't you know A-O bam man was asked who Christ was and he said Christ was...Didn't you know his stage designer was quoted for using a witches circle for his set design during his convention. You better check out your facts and dig deeper on who all these people are. Or haven't you figured out why their are party members standing up for Mc & P? The information is there if you really care about the country. Or is it just a chance for you to scream no religious people of any kind in governmen? Than dearest person who hasn't looked beyond what is in front of your nose...DON'T VOTE and leave the globe. Cause you can't handle what is really going down in politics or with either candidate. You'd **** your pants.

You just showed the world how really ignorant and unlearned the likes of "your kind" can put in one sentence.

And you showed the world what you don't know jack about the government, those that are elected or the world.

Stop being blind.


And the stupid shall inherit the earth.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  2  
Reply Mon 8 Sep, 2008 05:35 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

What cjh doesn't seem to realize is that men think Palin is more qualified for veep than women.


That's not totally true... the trend shows more real women are supporting the work horse known as Sarah Palin.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Sep, 2008 03:36 pm
@H2O MAN,
Show me proof of your claim?
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 Sep, 2008 06:15 pm
@Ramafuchs,
John McCain believes the Vietnam War was winnable. Now he argues that an Obama administration would accept defeat in Iraq, with grave costs to American honor and national security. Is McCain’s quest for victory a reflection of an antiquated pre-Vietnam mind-set? Or of a commitment to principles we abandon at our peril? Is there any war McCain thinks can’t be won?

by Jeffrey Goldberg
The Wars of John McCain

But McCain, though stalwart in defense of preemption, is not obtuse about its unpopularity; he knows that the idea of preemption has taken on a negative cast.

“With preemption, the connotation is that the cowboy just wants to go out and attack people,” he said. “The country is in one of our occasional periods of isolationism, a reaction to what [the public views] as failure, even when we are succeeding in Iraq"and we have succeeded in Iraq. There’s still going to be a greater reluctance than there was” before the Iraq War to try to stop an adversary from gaining possession of weapons of mass destruction.

As he said this, he seemed depleted by the discussion of preemption. It’s not the first unpopular cause he’s adopted, but it might be the most difficult one to sell to the American public.

It’s very hard to run for president on this idea right now.”
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200810/mccain/5
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/14/2019 at 09:39:49