Why do White People Dislike McCain?

Self hatred. We don't want to see the cracker succeed because that will mean that we have to stop blaming all our troubles on black people.

white guilt

Way too much estrogen in their diet.

oh yeah....and because he's carrying on like AN IDIOT

Perhaps you referring to the dumbmasses.

BPB is right. We're not specifically anti-McCain, we're just tired of the boosheet.

Boosheet? So McCain's a klansman?

because of his size 14 shoe?

Re: Why do White People Dislike McCain?


This might only mean that they like what they hear from Obama. It might have nothing to do with McCain.

But, must voters be identified by their skin tone? And, their skin tone affects how they respond to campaign promises?

Could it be that in this election race is a red-herring, since it might just get more people to the voting booth?

ebp hanging out with his (and McCain's) buddies

Ha ha.

That is a good picture. It expresses perfectly how I feel about ignorant bigots like the minutemen and their friends.

Thanks.

((That wasn't you taking the picture, was it? Cause that would be funny. ))

I fixed it for you :wink:

You can't spell "Homo" without an H and 2 Os.

Gargoyle is attempting to be funny.


.

You are a perfect example of a traitor to the United States, which I've maintained for years. A public lynching would be appropriate.

The consistent use of the terms "racist" and "bigots" to describe anyone opposed to illegal immigration shows who the true racists are, and it's not the Minutemen, nor me.

In my opinion, you are being too kind to call it illegal "immigration." Would it not be better described as just plain "squatting" in a country that they are not citizens? I should not say "illegal squatting," since that would be redundant.

I understand that some of these squatters have ancestry that were here to greet Columbus, and may just consider the entire hemisphere their rightful home; however, that logic is false, in my opinion, since I thought there were bounderies between different pre-Columbian tribes, and wars were fought between tribes. The Americas were not a peaceful, idyllic place before Columbus, where all indigenous people moved here or there as they chose; that might be the essential canard.

So, while these squatters seem to respect the borders of Latin American countries, better than the respect they seem to afford for the U.S. borders, can we deduce a bit of racism against Anglos (aka, Europeans historically)?

Also, while it is possible, I believe, to discuss the issue with a pro-squatter individual whose position is based on the "cheap labor" benefit of today's squatters, or the pro-squatter individual whose postion is based on the "future voter for his/her respective political party" benefit of today's squatters, I believe one cannot discuss the issue with a pro-squatter whose position is based on following the position of his/her religious beliefs that talks of the universality of mankind. The reason being, I believe, is that position often does not allow for any other position. Just my opinion, of course.

True, we are all humans, but we humans do have nations, citizenship and borders.

Agreed. That was a typo on my part.

I guess I'm being brainwashed by the MSM without realizing it.

To be more accurate, should there not be a better term for "illegal"?

How about "illegal economic refugee"? Does that not include the reason for coming here for many (without the legal process)?