But, but, but, Bill Clinton didn't need a vagina for sex!
0 Replies
Eva
1
Reply
Thu 17 Jul, 2008 02:24 pm
You're right, Bear. But it would be way too difficult to take vaginas. That's not a very practical solution. Let's take penises instead.
0 Replies
Francis
1
Reply
Thu 17 Jul, 2008 02:24 pm
You mean take vaginas for endless sex?
0 Replies
Setanta
1
Reply
Thu 17 Jul, 2008 02:28 pm
No, no, no . . . you're confusing endless sex with endless love . . . which is Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder playing tennis . . .
0 Replies
DrewDad
1
Reply
Thu 17 Jul, 2008 02:32 pm
Eva wrote:
Let's take penises instead.
I'm sure, given enough time, I could come up with a joke about women taking penises.....
0 Replies
Eva
1
Reply
Thu 17 Jul, 2008 02:34 pm
Take your time...
0 Replies
edgarblythe
1
Reply
Thu 17 Jul, 2008 02:37 pm
What does a vagina have to do with end sex?
0 Replies
Bi-Polar Bear
1
Reply
Thu 17 Jul, 2008 02:39 pm
DrewDad wrote:
Eva wrote:
Let's take penises instead.
I'm sure, given enough time, I could come up with a joke about women taking penises.....
Loren Bobbitt's sister was arrested last week for attempting to give her husband the same treatment Lorena gave her man. Fortunately for him she was so drunk she missed and merely badly gashed open his thigh. He was treated and released.... she was arrested and charged with
ready?
a missedaweiner......
0 Replies
Green Witch
1
Reply
Thu 17 Jul, 2008 02:39 pm
I'm not going to vote until Hanno writes at least three paragraphs of what he thinks about the issue.
0 Replies
Eva
1
Reply
Thu 17 Jul, 2008 02:39 pm
You're right, edgar!
See, he's on my side! We should take penises.
0 Replies
djjd62
1
Reply
Thu 17 Jul, 2008 02:48 pm
Green Witch wrote:
I'm not going to vote until Hanno writes at least three paragraphs of what he thinks about the issue.