Reply
Thu 11 Sep, 2003 09:42 pm
Reserve and Guard tours extended
Quote:Reserve Tours Are Extended
Army Orders 1-Year Stay In Iraq, Nearby Nations
By Vernon Loeb and Steve Vogel
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, September 9, 2003; Page A01
With U.S. forces stretched thin in Iraq and the Bush administration still searching for additional international peacekeepers, the Army has ordered thousands of National Guard and Army Reserve forces in Iraq to extend their tours in the country to a year, months longer than many of the troops had anticipated, Army officials said yesterday.
While defense officials have had authority since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to activate Guard and reserve troops for two years, most to date have been called up for only a year of total service, which has included weeks or months for training in the United States before heading to Iraq as well as debriefings once they returned home.
The new order, requiring 12-month tours on the ground in Iraq or surrounding countries, means that many Guard and Army Reserve troops could have their original year-long mobilizations extended for anywhere from one to six months, Army officials said.
The order comes after months of concern inside and outside the Army that an over-reliance on Guard and Reserve forces by the Bush administration in the war on terrorism could adversely affect retention and recruiting. Some officials have expressed concern that this could break the Guard and Reserve system, which augments the active-duty force with critical engineering, military police, civil affairs and psychological operations specialists.
So, considering that enlistments both for Active Duty and Reserves are declining,and re-enlistments are dropping as well, is conscription on its way back? I don't see the US leaving Iraq anytime soon. 10-15 years is beginning to seem realistic. With the declining enlistment pool how else can the US military fulfill its various commitments?
I doubt that even Captain Happy and crew are stupid enough to screw their electoral prospects by a resort to conscription. I would opine that they'll try to squeak by, and if they introduce conscription, it would only be after winning the next election, if that occurs.
From Today's NY TImes. Sort of long, but worth the read. My reasons for suspecting that conscription may become an eventuality are illustrated fairly well by this piece.
"There's nowhere for me to go in the Army but back there."