1
   

Even more PATRIOT

 
 
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2003 05:07 pm
UNPATRIOT Act
Locking Down Democracy to Keep America Free
by Jim Hightower


It's September 11 - do you know where John Ashcroft is?

It's been two years since America was attacked by al Qaeda terrorists wielding box cutters. Two years since George W. promised to "smoke 'em out," make Americans safe from foreign terrorists, and "secure our freedoms." Two years since our airports and practically every other public facility and private office building have been locked down, requiring all of us to submit to constant surveillance - from poking into our personal belongings to routinely wanding our bodies. Two years since hundreds of billions of our tax dollars have been diverted from other crucial needs to build the surveillance state. Two years during which our Brave New Homeland Security Department has been issuing its "Code Orange" alerts and advising us to defend ourselves with duct tape.

So do you feel safe? Or just a little bit suckered?

After two years of "protecting" our freedom by suspending our freedoms, here's what scares me: Not al Qaeda, but our own homegrown autocrats - Ashcroft and other political extremists and opportunists who fan the embers of fear, then drape a veil of patriotism over their push to impose a police-state mentality on our Land of the Free.

Yes, foreign terrorists can do us bodily harm, but they're no threat to the soul of America. They can't take our liberties from us, can't militarize our society, can't dim the light of America's proud democratic beacon, can't force our soldiers into imperialistic wars to make the world safe for Halliburton, can't change the essential principles of egalitarianism that undergird our society. But our own so-called leaders can do all of thisĀŠand they are. BushCo, backed by spineless Wobblycrats in Congress and cheered on by a fawning media establishment, have had two years and an unlimited budget to work their will in response to 9/11, and it's now time for us to speak bluntly about their efforts: These people are NUTS!

And dangerous. They can't find Osama bin Laden (and have even diverted our military from that legitimate purpose), but they have amassed a shiny new arsenal of police powers so they can always find you and me - tracking the library books we check out, the medicines we take, our political associations, our private internet searches, our psychiatric records, the church groups we join, and the charities we support.

Far from making us safer, Ashcroft's autocratic antics empower police to crack down on legitimate citizen activism without doing anything that will actually stop determined terrorists. In fact, the Feds had all the legal tools and resources they needed to stop the crashbombers prior to September 11, but they misused or ignored what they had. America is not made stronger by weakening our First and Fourth Amendment rights.

This is why a grassroots rebellion has flared nationwide against the USA PATRIOT Act. Some 150 cities - as well as the states of Alaska, Hawaii, and Vermont - already have passed resolutions opposing the abusive Act, and some police departments have said that they will not cooperate with FBI investigations that they deem to be unconstitutional infringements on people's liberties.

The public outcry has been so great that even Congress is stirring into action. In July, the House stunned Ashcroft by voting 309 to 118 for a Republican-sponsored amendment to block the use of federal funds for the PATRIOT Act's secret "sneak-and-peek" searches of people's homes and offices. There also is bipartisan backing for the "Library and Personal Records Privacy Act" to undo some of the Act's worst provisions, and for the "Rights of Individuals Act" to narrowly define who is a terrorist and to tighten the rein on the FBI's fishing expeditions.

In response to all of this, the White House took the most hilarious step imaginable: It sent Ashcroft on a two-week cross-country charm tour to sing the virtues of the PATRIOT Act! What, was Bela Lugosi not available? Of course, Ashcroft's tour included no public meetings - he spoke only before police groups. But no matter what kind of pretty cover he tries to put on the act, it's a hopeless as putting earrings on a hog - he just can't hide the ugliness down below.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 759 • Replies: 15
No top replies

 
fealola
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2003 05:22 pm
Reading
0 Replies
 
fealola
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2003 05:41 pm
Quote:
So do you feel safe? Or just a little bit suckered?


They don't make me feel safe. They make me feel afraid. Afraid of them. They're trying to make me afraid of outside forces and sometimes I am, but mostly I feel suckered.

I've been suspicious from day one. Notice there hasn't been much talk of terrorist threats or publicity for the color alerts, lately? And look what happens today of all days, old Osama Bin Laden comes crawling out of his hole again. Or did he?
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2003 05:43 pm
My paranoid side says the administration needs another attack, and wouldn't go out of their way to prevent one if they thought they coud use it to their advantage. Sad
0 Replies
 
fealola
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2003 06:02 pm
I think they want to make us paranoid. Well they got that. But alot of people are paranoid over them. Not what they were expecting.
0 Replies
 
bigdice67
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2003 07:01 pm
uhh wow, that Hightower guy is speaking europeanese!
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:33 am
Only slighty on topic, but significant for revealing a glimpse of that rare bird, a rich white man speaking out against the administration:

NBA Commissioner David Stern said that Kobe Bryant, despite awaiting a potential sexual assault trial in Colorado, should continue to play for the Lakers this season.

"Absolutely," Stern, when asked if Bryant should play, told the Los Angeles Times for Tuesday's editions. "We don't have a Patriot Act in the NBA. That means that you're innocent until proven guilty.

ESPN.com
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:39 am
How novel
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:47 am
But, but . . . he was convicted in the court of the Yellow Press--he's guilty as sin, can't you all see that? And he's black anyway, you all know what that means . . .

What kind of creeping socialism is this, when the popular press isn't free to excoriate someone and blacken his good name without liberal whining . . . i'm just sickened . . .
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:48 am
ooooooohhhhh.... wow, PDiddie!

Thanks for the article, Hobitbob.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:51 am
John Ashcroft poses ten times the threat to America than does Bin Laden.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:53 am
at least 10 times.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:57 am
I stand corrected!
0 Replies
 
Italgato
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Sep, 2003 03:46 am
I'm sure Frank A Pissa doesn't know this but the HomelandSecurity Act was passed on November 19,2002 by a vote of 90-9.

People who know how the government works and who have actually read the Constitution and the Amendments will tell you that very little

can be done without the vote of the Senate and the House.

The Senate and the House had to vote to approve the Patriot Act. They approved it 98-1 (Even Ted Kennedy voted for it).

It is called "checks and balances". I don't know if Frank A Pisa is aware of that.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Sep, 2003 05:33 am
Americans should be more and more afraid as the next elections approaches. Bush needs a terrorist attack to prove his point!
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Sep, 2003 09:35 am
Italgato wrote:
I'm sure Frank A Pissa doesn't know this but the HomelandSecurity Act was passed on November 19,2002 by a vote of 90-9.

People who know how the government works and who have actually read the Constitution and the Amendments will tell you that very little

can be done without the vote of the Senate and the House.

The Senate and the House had to vote to approve the Patriot Act. They approved it 98-1 (Even Ted Kennedy voted for it).

It is called "checks and balances". I don't know if Frank A Pisa is aware of that.


I'm sure there are lots of things you don't know, Gato.

But what have I said that makes you think I am unaware of the concept of "checks and balances" which the framers of our constitution borrowed from the philosophical discourses of John Locke -- especially his social contract theories?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Even more PATRIOT
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 02:41:53