Rape: What is it?

On top of that, boomer is right. Not one woman here agrees with you so you can't even begin to think you're speaking for any number of us.

dagmaraka wrote:

hawkeye10 wrote:

dagmaraka wrote:

scenario: you go for a dinner with a male friend or a colleague or acquaintance. unbeknowst to you he's gay. he has expectations of getting real close with you after the get-together. you decline, but he pursues, thinking you're just playing hard to get. in the end he forces himself upon you against your will.

now tell me, is that also right from the gay acquaintance's point of view?

This does not strike me as a real world situation. Most of the time the gay men are on good behaviour because they know that if they mess with the wrong hetro guy they will get their ass kicked. Understand the power dynamics and all will become clear to you.

you SO have no clue.

the gay guys I know say that they don't have any trouble finding other gay guys to have sex with. They have no need to mess with guys that might not be gay. But then I know nothing...right?

Bella Dea wrote:

On top of that, boomer is right. Not one woman here agrees with you so you can't even begin to think you're speaking for any number of us.

I doubt that few, if any, men would agree either.

I just wonder why these same threads keep popping up... agrote & paedophilia and hackeye and rape. Haven't we already had these discussions many times over? I think you two need to find a new forum for your peculiar views.

Seven pages and not a whiff of a counter argument tells be that there is no one brave enough to take this topic up. It was worth the try.

Hackass, why don't you just STFU?

Not one person has agreed with you; most of us don't think you're worth talking to, and nobody thinks your position is worth defending or debating.

You and agrote's topics are just ugly. Go somewhere else, why don't you?

hawkeye10 wrote:

Seven pages and not a whiff of a counter argument tells be that there is no one brave enough to take this topic up. It was worth the try.

Your reading incomprehension is only exceeded by your lack of knowing right from wrong.

Brave? Get a grip wimpy. Anyone who speaks of women as you do has some serious problems and it probably results from some perverse sense of misguided machoism.

Intrepid wrote:

hawkeye10 wrote:

Seven pages and not a whiff of a counter argument tells be that there is no one brave enough to take this topic up. It was worth the try.

Your reading incomprehension is only exceeded by your lack of knowing right from wrong.

Brave? Get a grip wimpy. Anyone who speaks of women as you do has some serious problems and it probably results from some perverse sense of misguided machoism.

If I have said anything about women that can not be documented then shame on me. You can see the documentation after you show up to the debate and make a counter argument. You don't get to see my cards for free.

Seven pages of agreement that you and your ideas are as heinous as you are disgusting... and you're dumb enough to think it's a question of bravery? Try this:

My name is Bill Ward. I live in Cedarburg, WI.

Who are you and where do you live brave guy?

hawkeye10 wrote:

Intrepid wrote:

hawkeye10 wrote:

Seven pages and not a whiff of a counter argument tells be that there is no one brave enough to take this topic up. It was worth the try.

Your reading incomprehension is only exceeded by your lack of knowing right from wrong.

Brave? Get a grip wimpy. Anyone who speaks of women as you do has some serious problems and it probably results from some perverse sense of misguided machoism.

If I have said anything about women that can not be documented then shame on me. You can see the documentation after you show up to the debate and make a counter argument. You don't get to see my cards for free.

You have, once again, shown your incomprehension and false sense of maturity.