0
   

McCain Agenda

 
 
Reply Thu 26 Jun, 2008 08:27 pm
http://tinyurl.com/6nw7cc

Quote:

Deroy Murdock: McCain offers a bold, pro-market agenda for America

By DEROY MURDOCK

Tuesday, May. 27, 2008

WHILE AMERICANS focus on the interminable Clinton-Obama celebrity death match, Sen. John McCain is using clear-headed, compellingly crafted speeches to propose surprisingly bold, free-market ideas. With one huge exception, the Arizona Republican advocates more limited, open government as his Democratic rivals promise tax hikes and an even-busier state. Voters should welcome this stark contrast.

On spending, John McCain would rule with a tight fist.

"There will be no more subsidies for special pleaders -- no more corporate welfare -- no more throwing around billions of dollars of the people's money on pet projects, while the people themselves are struggling to afford their homes, groceries, and gas," McCain said April 15 in Pittsburgh. "I will veto every bill with earmarks, until the Congress stops sending bills with earmarks," McCain continued. "I will seek a constitutionally valid line-item veto to end the practice once and for all." More impressive, McCain said, "We will institute a one-year pause in discretionary spending increases with the necessary exemption of military spending and veterans' benefits."

Such prudence would be a welcome relief from the Bush/GOP Congress years that did for fiscal responsibility what the Playboy Mansion has done for sexual restraint.

McCain's budget discipline would make it easier to cut taxes. He wants to make President Bush's tax cuts permanent. He would slice corporate taxes from 35 to 25 percent. He also would scrap the Alternative Minimum Tax, double the dependents' exemption from $3,500 to $7,000, "and sign into law a reform agenda to permit the first-year expensing of new equipment and technology."

Most significantly, he would let Americans choose to file taxes under today's rules or volunteer for a simpler, flatter rate, perhaps at 25 or 15 percent.

Regarding health care, McCain warned in Tampa, Fla., on April 29 that his opponents "urge universal coverage, with all the tax increases, new mandates, and government regulation that come along with that idea. But in the end, this will accomplish one thing only. We will replace the inefficiency, irrationality, and uncontrolled costs of the current system with the inefficiency, irrationality, and uncontrolled costs of a government monopoly."

Instead, McCain believes that "the key to real reform is to restore control over our health-care system to the patients themselves." He would expand Health Savings Accounts, and more dramatically, offer a tax credit of $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families to help Americans purchase their own coverage, even across state lines. McCain added, "It would be yours and your family's health-care plan, and yours to keep."

McCain also calls for reining in the misguided, multi-trillion-dollar Medicare drug plan.

"People like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet don't need their prescriptions underwritten by taxpayers," McCain observed. "This reform alone will save billions of dollars that could be returned to taxpayers or put to better use."

There is a cautionary note among these encouraging signs: John McCain has beer-bonged the Kool-Aid on global warming.

"We need to deal with the central facts of rising temperatures, rising waters, and all the endless troubles that global warming will bring," McCain said May 12 at a Portland, Ore., wind-power research facility.

He desires "a cap-and-trade system to change the dynamic of our energy economy." His specific goal is to reduce CO2 60 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Former Virginia state climatologist Dr. Patrick Michaels estimated in the May 16 Washington Times that this would lower per-capita emissions "to 19th Century levels."

Before relegating America's mid-21st Century economy to the norms of the Grover Cleveland era, McCain should heed the expanding caucus of experts who believe so-called "global warming" is exaggerated, if it even exists.

On May 19, the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine released a petition signed by 31,072 Americans scientists, including 9,021 Ph.D.s. They reject the idea that CO2 is boiling Earth. So much for climate science being "settled."

One hopes McCain will listen on this issue. Just as he recently has warmed to tax cuts, perhaps he will cool on "global warming."

Nonetheless, McCain will remain a mixed bag. Sometimes he will annoy the Right. Other times, he boldly will go where no GOP standard bearer has gone since Ronald Reagan. As a wise man said, "John McCain is not perfect. Just perfect enough."

Deroy Murdock is a columnist with Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University. E-mail him at [email protected].
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 511 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 05:53 am
Wow! The right has really gotten soft.

They are now vigorously supporting a candidate who wants to give amnesty to "illegal" people, thinks global warming is real and said we should keep religion out of public life.

I remember when real conservatives had balls.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 06:18 am
For anybody else who might have missed it, there AREN'T any republicans in this coming election. The choice is between a 1950s - 60s democrat and a 2008 democrat.

There are different theories as to how this came about. Some blame it entirely on dems and independants voting in pubbie primaries; my own view is that the pubbic rank and file has voted for the least frightening candidate and basically told the right wing of the party to screw off and eat **** and die and the biggest single factor involved is probably "Right2Life(TM)" which, of all the right wing causes I know of, is the one I wish I'd never heard of.

The good news is that McCain is free to adjust his position on things like energy or "global warming" as evidence dictates, while the dems are frozen into ideological positions and are not.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 06:25 am
McCain isn't adjusting his position on global warming. Nor is he really adjusting his position on amnesty for illegals (he still says he will give them amnesty). He has never been a Republican... he pretended to be a Republican to get the nomination, but now that we are in the election, watch him return to his wimpy liberal positions.

Do you know he is a featured speaker at La Raza in July?

If the Republican party can take our votes for granted; if it doesn't have to earn our votes by defending American values, then it never will.

Better to vote for Bob Barr-- or just stay home.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 06:30 am
Quote:

John McCain Is A Liberal Gun Grabber
by
Pastor Chuck Baldwin
As published at NewsWithViews

The last thing we need is another liberal neocon in the White House. If the Presidency of George W. Bush proved anything, it proved the hazard of electing phony Republican conservatives. At least one is able to clearly see a liberal for what he or she is when they have a "D" behind their name. But put an "R" behind the name and suddenly their liberal, Big-Government, anti-freedom agenda is barely recognized, which makes a liberal Republican much more dangerous than a liberal Democrat.

Let me say it straight out: a John McCain Presidency would be far worse than a Barack Obama Presidency. With a Democrat in the White House, conservatives and Christians suddenly find their principles and are able to offer resistance. Put a Republican in the Oval Office, however, and those same people become blind, deaf, and dumb to most any principle they profess.

Nowhere is McCain's chicanery and duplicity more jeopardous than in the area of the right to keep and bear arms. On issues relating to the Second Amendment, John McCain is a disaster! For example, the highly respected Gun Owners of America (GOA) rates McCain with a grade of F-. McCain's failing grade is well deserved.


article continues at http://www.gunowners.org/mcgungrab.htm
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:31 am
Two simple words: "runoff elections".

Until we have them, I'm voting against democrats.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:36 am
If you are voting for McCain... you can't say you are voting against Democrats.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jun, 2008 10:22 am
Obama adviser: McCain is with the Dick Cheney wing of the Bush administration by David Edwards and Muriel Kane
Published: Friday June 27, 2008

North Korea has recently taken significant steps towards nuclear disarmament, leading the Bush administration to lift some sanctions and notify Congress that North Korea will be removed from the US list of state sponsors of terrorism.

Susan Rice, a former Assistant Secretary of State and senior foreign policy adviser to Barack Obama, told MSNBC's Joe Scarborough on Friday that these events represent "an important, albeit modest, first step."

"What we see is that diplomacy, direct diplomacy, can in fact yield modest results," Rice stated. "We would not have gotten this far if the Bush administration had not belatedly ... [turned] to negotiations. Now, John McCain is with the Dick Cheney wing of the Bush administration ..."

Scarborough interrupted Rice at that point to challenge her use of the word "belatedly." He also asked her, "Are you just saying that this is 'a modest step' because you're in the middle of a political campaign?"

"It's in fact what President Bush said yesterday," Rice explained. "There's a lot we still don't know. We don't know what's happened to North Korea's suspected uranium enrichment program ... the nuclear material that it's already made ... whether it's proliferated its technology to Syria or other places of concern."

Rice then returned to her suggestion that "had we listened to Dick Cheney and, indeed, John McCain, we would not have this progress today."

"John McCain opposed negotiations," Rice emphasized. "In 1994, he advocated airstrikes against North Korea and threatened North Korea with extinction. Had we done that we would be in a very, very different place than we are today."

This video is from MSNBC's Morning Joe, broadcast June 27, 2008.
link
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2008 07:57 pm
With North Korea's making a show of eliminating some nuclear efforts, does this remind anyone of the eventual release of the American hostages in Iran in 1979, when it started to become apparent that Reagan would likely be the next President?

I don't think many adversarial nations would really like to test McCain's fortitude and resolve.

Another reason to vote for McCain.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » McCain Agenda
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 07/08/2025 at 03:05:10