9
   

Is it wrong to view child pornography?

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Sun 9 Oct, 2011 01:45 pm
@hawkeye10,
David wrote:
Have u probed his feelings, his representations, to u?
In other words, have u asked him the reason that he thinks its "wrong" to look at it ?
hawkeye10 wrote:
In America one is not allowed to believe that looking at child porn is OK, this is one of our taboos.
To argue in favor of allowing child porn is to define yourself as sick, and the argument falls on deaf ears, as Agrote found out.
U r saying that reasoning is subordinated to emotion, pre-emptively; is that accurate ?





David
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Sun 9 Oct, 2011 01:54 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
U r saying that reasoning is subordinated to emotion, pre-emptively; is that accurate ?
Of course...Americans would not be so easily manipulated by fear if this were not so. In part this is due to Americans being very emotional people, we are now used to indulging our emotions; is because Americans have trashed masculinity which used to be a prophylactic against over emotionalism; is because Americans are poorly educated thus dont have the ability to reason or to know the truth; and lastly is because are spiritually empty and so we are always looking for something to fill that hole with and are unable to stake our ground and stick to it.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Sun 9 Oct, 2011 02:06 pm
@hawkeye10,
David wrote:
U r saying that reasoning is subordinated to emotion, pre-emptively; is that accurate ?
hawkeye10 wrote:
Of course...Americans would not be so easily manipulated by fear if this were not so. In part this is due to Americans being very emotional people,
I think the Italians, maybe the French r more emotional; yes?



hawkeye10 wrote:
we are now used to indulging our emotions; is because Americans have trashed masculinity which used to be a prophylactic against over emotionalism;
I dunno about that, Hawkeye; I don 't feel less masculine. Do u feel less masculine ?






hawkeye10 wrote:
is because Americans are poorly educated thus dont have the ability to reason or to know the truth; and lastly is because are spiritually empty and so we are always looking for something to fill that hole with and are unable to stake our ground and stick to it.
HOW do u propose that we spiritually fill that hole ?

Incidentally, I have argued with almost anyone,
including nazis, commies, and gun controlers regardless of them being sick. Its fun.





David
Rockhead
 
  1  
Sun 9 Oct, 2011 02:13 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
I dunno, dave.

the image of him inside of a prophylactic kinda sticks with me...
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Sun 9 Oct, 2011 02:18 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
I think the Italians, maybe the French r more emotional; yes?
IDK, i am not Italian nor French, I only know that in America we are much more emotional than we were back when we were a stronger and better country, and that I continue to see emotional manipulation employed with success.

Quote:
I dunno about that, Hawkeye; I don 't feel less masculine. Do u feel less masculine
no, but I was forged a long time ago....I do however see much less masculinity in our society especially among the young, and I see those men who do display masculinity increasingly under attack for doing so. Women are supposed to become more masculine than their mothers were and men are supposed to become more feminine than their fathers were, those who resist the imperative are subjected to sanctions.

Quote:
HOW do u propose that we spiritually fill that hole ?
Spiritually healing a lost and broken people is the most difficult task of civilization, and ours is now very weak and thus not up to the job. I dont think this gets fixed until this civilization dies and the next one is born. It will not be long, but I will not live to see it, but my kids might.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Sun 9 Oct, 2011 02:30 pm
@hawkeye10,
David wrote:
I think the Italians, maybe the French r more emotional; yes?
hawkeye10 wrote:
IDK, i am not Italian nor French,
Where were u born ?



hawkeye10 wrote:
I only know that in America we are much more emotional than we were back when we were a stronger and better country, and that I continue to see emotional manipulation employed with success.


David wrote:
I dunno about that, Hawkeye; I don 't feel less masculine.
Do u feel less masculine ?
hawkeye10 wrote:
no, but I was forged a long time ago....I do however see much less masculinity in our society especially among the young, and I see those men who do display masculinity increasingly under attack for doing so. Women are supposed to become more masculine than their mothers were and men are supposed to become more feminine than their fathers were, those who resist the imperative are subjected to sanctions.
WHAT sanctions ?




David wrote:
HOW do u propose that we spiritually fill that hole ?
hawkeye10 wrote:
Spiritually healing a lost and broken people is the most difficult task of civilization, and ours is now very weak and thus not up to the job. I dont think this gets fixed until this civilization dies and the next one is born. It will not be long, but I will not live to see it, but my kids might.
How does a civilization die ?
( other than being wiped out or occupied by alien invaders ? )
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Sun 9 Oct, 2011 03:18 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Where were u born ?


Lansing MI

Quote:
WHAT sanctions
In the case of men who fail to act feminine disapproval, shunning and public berating . In the case of women who fail to act masculine disapproval and economic disadvantage.


Quote:
How does a civilization die ?

The myths and the institutions are replaced with new ones. I have been sure since 1985 that the next civilization will be a combination of East and West centered around human quality of life conducted in a sustainable fashion, and I have seen since that time no indication that I am wrong. What exactly it will look like remains to be seen. A global government is a strong possibility though, made much more likely through the spread of terrorism. There is also now indication that the overpopulation/break down of the Earth bio systems problem will deteriorate much more rapid than previously thought, which also argues for global government. For damn sure the days of the merchants and money men running the show are coming to a rapid end.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Sun 9 Oct, 2011 03:35 pm
@hawkeye10,
A global government will surely descend into a more thorough despotism than communism or nazism,
because of available technology of surveillance and of enforcement; scary, very scary, a lot worse than private terrorism.

We 'd surely become The Borg.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Sun 9 Oct, 2011 04:05 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
We 'd surely become The Borg
No, you are familiar with America which has lost its way, enlightened governments can and sometimes to refuse to use their capacity to run over the citizen. Personal freedom and government are only adversaries if the government insists upon making the situation so.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 10 Oct, 2011 04:37 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
We 'd surely become The Borg
hawkeye10 wrote:
No, you are familiar with America which has lost its way, enlightened governments can and sometimes to refuse to use their capacity to run over the citizen. Personal freedom and government are only adversaries if the government insists upon making the situation so.
It woud be only a matter of time. I don 't say that it woud be instant,
but when it eventually took effect, there 'd be no light at the end of the tunnel,
no America coming to the rescue of the enslaved Germans. It woud be forever in the hell of the Borg. Only death woud rescue us.
joefromchicago
 
  2  
Mon 10 Oct, 2011 09:06 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
To argue in favor of allowing child porn is to define yourself as sick, and the argument falls on deaf ears, as Agrote found out.

Agrote, it turned out, was merely looking for an ethical loophole that would allow him to conform to society's condemnation of child pornography in general while still viewing it himself in practice. His was an inherently dishonest position that had little to do with a desire to redefine the way we look at child porn and a great deal to do with his desire to indulge his own perversions with a clear conscience.
north
 
  1  
Mon 10 Oct, 2011 11:03 am
@joefromchicago,
joefromchicago wrote:

hawkeye10 wrote:
To argue in favor of allowing child porn is to define yourself as sick, and the argument falls on deaf ears, as Agrote found out.

Agrote, it turned out, was merely looking for an ethical loophole that would allow him to conform to society's condemnation of child pornography in general while still viewing it himself in practice. His was an inherently dishonest position that had little to do with a desire to redefine the way we look at child porn and a great deal to do with his desire to indulge his own perversions with a clear conscience.


agreed

and to add where does the impact upon the child come into this as well

my goodness , what of the child , what of the child !!!!

OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 10 Oct, 2011 11:18 am
@north,
north wrote:
agreed

and to add where does the impact upon the child come into this as well

my goodness , what of the child , what of the child !!!!
Shoud the child have the legal right to sue in tort
for compensatory money damages?
north
 
  1  
Mon 10 Oct, 2011 11:45 am
@OmSigDAVID,

north wrote:
agreed

and to add where does the impact upon the child come into this as well

my goodness , what of the child , what of the child !!!!


Quote:
Shoud the child have the legal right to sue in tort
for compensatory money damages?


yes

but money never heals the psychological damage upon the child
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 10 Oct, 2011 12:08 pm
@north,
north wrote:
agreed

and to add where does the impact upon the child come into this as well

my goodness , what of the child , what of the child !!!!


David wrote:
Shoud the child have the legal right to sue in tort
for compensatory money damages?
north wrote:
yes

but money never heals the psychological damage upon the child
I see. Well, as a rule, after a plaintiff in a tort trial
has made his case on liability (i.e., proving fault in the defendant),
he must prove the existence and the extent of his personal injuries.

Before we consider damages,
let 's consider who shoud properly be a legally liable defendant.
If when I was a child in Arizona, I found out that someone in Texas
looked at some child pornografy, shoud I be rightfully entitled to compensation for his doing that ?
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Mon 10 Oct, 2011 12:20 pm
@north,
Quote:
but money never heals the psychological damage upon the child
And the oft made claim that the child is damaged even it he/she never even knows that the pic of them exist, even if those who view the pic never have a name to put to the face, is truly ridiculous. We now have the situation where a person takes a pic of a girl in a bathing suit the she never knows is taken, and he spreads the pic to other guys who like to look at little girls, and the state comes up with the claim that they are spreading child porn and that the kid has been damaged. How the state gets away with floating such BS IDK, but they need to stop if they want to be taken seriously.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 10 Oct, 2011 12:24 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
but money never heals the psychological damage upon the child
hawkeye10 wrote:
And the oft made claim that the child is damaged even it he/she never even knows that the pic of them exist, even if those who view the pic never have a name to put to the face, is truly ridiculous.
In fairness, before something is categorized as being "ridiculous" its advocate
shoud be given the opportunity to express his justification.





David

hawkeye10
 
  1  
Mon 10 Oct, 2011 12:25 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
It woud be only a matter of time. I don 't say that it woud be instant


This is one of the places where you and I split, you think that government can never be trusted and I think that government can sometimes be run by enlightened people who resist the urge to descend into abusing their citizens. I think that we do agree however that the current American government is not worthy of this trust, and that it needs to be taken in hand, shrunk, and retaught who the boss is.
north
 
  1  
Mon 10 Oct, 2011 12:27 pm
@OmSigDAVID,

north wrote:
agreed

and to add where does the impact upon the child come into this as well

my goodness , what of the child , what of the child !!!!


David wrote:
Shoud the child have the legal right to sue in tort
for compensatory money damages?
north wrote:
yes

but money never heals the psychological damage upon the child


Quote:
I see. Well, as a rule, after a plaintiff in a tort trial
has made his case on liability (i.e., proving fault in the defendant),
he must prove the existence and the extent of his personal injuries.


that is subjective , to him

as a child , how do you know or how would you his potential without the abuse in the first place ? then

as well what of a young girl

the loss of virginity and self worth as well

which really is applicable to both sexes


Quote:
Before we consider damages,
let 's consider who shoud properly be a legally liable defendant.
If when I was a child in Arizona, I found out that someone in Texas
looked at some child pornografy, shoud I be rightfully entitled to compensation for his doing that ?


yes
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 10 Oct, 2011 12:30 pm
@hawkeye10,
David wrote:
It woud be only a matter of time. I don 't say that it woud be instant
hawkeye10 wrote:
This is one of the places where you and I split, you think that government can never be trusted and I think that government can sometimes be run by enlightened people who resist the urge to descend into abusing their citizens. I think that we do agree however that the current American government is not worthy of this trust, and that it needs to be taken in hand, shrunk, and retaught who the boss is.
It CAN be trusted; anyone can be trusted, but that 's never wise.

I agree that "SOMETIMES" will not descend into despotism,
even tho it has the means to do so. When those times have finished,
then it WILL.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.16 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 10:50:37