kuvasz wrote:
That is simple to explain; first, Webb wants GIs to get college educations, and parents to have paid maternity leave, and those are majority held beliefs, so you don't speak with objective authority on calling his positions "liberal," second, when you say that I do not readily understand how Webb's persona disturbs liberal sensibilities, you have to show proof for that misunderstanding, and you haven't illustrated that in my writings. third, I am a liberal because of my class-conciousness, recognizing concomitant inequalities of economic class, and so too Webb recognizes and has commented on repeatedly about the same inequalities, while those which you refer to as being disturbed as liberalism's most influential members; they are not liberals simply because of class inequalities as Webb and I recognize, but via personal tastes and lifestyles.
I happen to side with George Bush's favorite philosopher; a true revolutionary in his own day.
Quote:34Then the King will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world.
35For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in,
36I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.'
37"Then the righteous will answer him, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink?
38When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you?
39When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?'
40"The King will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.'
-Matt. 25:34-40
Frankly, I am liberal because I believe in the truth of the words of Jesus spoken above and am driven to political positions to help those who cannot help themselves.
My question is, why you aren't?
You only need to peruse the Liberal journals to understand that a fair share of leftist intellectuals don't share your fondness for Sen. Webb.
If you don't agree with them, so be it, but try and deny there is a left wing movement to stop a Webb VP selections.
Far be it for me to challenge Webb's liberal bonafides. I'm more than happy to designate him as a Liberal. It seems, however, that persons far left of me question his credentials: He is violent, he supports southern crackers, etc etc etc.
The answer to your final question: "
Why you aren't [believing in the truth of the words of Jesus] ?
First of all, we can argue whether or not Jesus was a liberal, but let's put aside such arguments.
I'm afraid, despite your assumption, I don't consider the teachings of Jesus to be "Gospel."
The teachings of Jesus are certainly worth my consideration, but no more or less than the teachings of Lao Tzu, Mohammed, Buddha, Zoroaster, or Mary Baker Eddy.
I am not bound by any of these sages' teachings any more than they were bound by the sages that came before them.
I don't profess to being a sage, but neither do I limit my opinions to those of sages who pre-date me.
If you predicate your beliefs upon the teachings of Jesus, good for you! I might suggest that you spend some time actually correlating your beliefs with his, but that is up to you my Christian Warrior.