Objectivism 101

Amigo wrote:

I know what you are thats why I treat you like $hit.

read the thread?!?!

Inproper Objectivism 101 (my Bull$hit in alot of big words with somebody elses ideas )

What the F#@K is an Inproper Objectivist?????????

**** OFF TROLL.

0 Replies

ok

inproper objectivism (Nietzche) will not beat Zionism. It's the same thing.

0 Replies

Amigo wrote:

ok

inproper objectivism (Nietzche) will not beat Zionism. It's the same thing.

What a surprise, you're a Jew Rolling Eyes

0 Replies

DavidIg wrote:

Amigo wrote:
I know what you are thats why I treat you like $hit.

read the thread?!?!

Inproper Objectivism 101 (my Bull$hit in alot of big words with somebody elses ideas )

What the F#@K is an Inproper Objectivist?????????

**** OFF TROLL.

Here a troll, there a troll, everywhere a troll, troll.

0 Replies

Hey! I thought you said I was a treasure???? Evil or Very Mad

A Treasure Troll? Very Happy

DavidIg a Troll ????? Why you Bumkin, he's not a troll.Don't you know an inproper Objectivist when you see one?

0 Replies

Bumkin, eh?

Why, I aughtta....

No, sweetie, you aren't a troll. I was just adding some equal intelligence to this thread as David's.

I might have said, "Pot meets kettle" but that would have been the same.

David.... hmmm, nice Hebrew name you've got there.

0 Replies

DavidIg wrote:

Amigo wrote:
ok

inproper objectivism (Nietzche) will not beat Zionism. It's the same thing.

What a surprise, you're a Jew

You got me pegged.

I'm an illegal immigrant Jewish dishwasher.

0 Replies

JPB : Here a troll, there a troll, everywhere a troll, troll.

Why do people look down on trolling? Trolling for the criminal mentality is a fine sport.

http://www.individual-sovereignty.com/pic/thumbsup.gif

Just in this thread alone, I have caught some big bible thumping political whores, that spew their Jewish <strike>dogma</strike> dog-****, as if it was a valid system of control, only to expose the true nature of their sociopathic tyrant criminal mentality.

http://www.individual-sovereignty.com/pic/rotf.gif

0 Replies

Everywhere you go there's a Jew or wankers defending the Jews{Zionists}......+ so-called intellectuals having nothing to say wrt the substance of the thread, but instead, want to make it a batlle of personalities aka a decoy.

0 Replies

Or, the point being, there is little substance to the thread.

0 Replies

This thread is really about philosophy/objective knowledge...so if you have an interest in either, go back and read the posts I made that spoke on such knowledge, otherwise exit the thread bimbo.

A=A, existence exits, reality is absolute, ethics are objective etc, etc...oh, and most ancient philosophers are full of ****.......funny how we accept science as having advanced, but not philosophy Shocked

0 Replies

You're offensive David - that offensiveness pretty much dilutes any real message you might have. Too bad - because I really was interested in learning and talking about objectivism/collectivism and how it might influence beliefs about and actions takens around what is right and what is wrong....

But I can't talk right or wrong with a racist or anti-semite. It'd be a waste of my time (in my individual opinion).

0 Replies

I don't think I'm entitled to anything. I wonder where those objective rights would come from. Just curious.

DavidIg wrote:

Pete34 wrote:
Speaking of which ... anyone wanna explain this objective human rights business?

Are you suggesting that you don't believe you're entitled to the right to life, liberty, property and the "pursuit" of happiness?

0 Replies

aidan wrote:

You're offensive David - that offensiveness pretty much dilutes any real message you might have. Too bad - because I really was interested in learning and talking about objectivism/collectivism and how it might influence beliefs about and actions takens around what is right and what is wrong....

But I can't talk right or wrong with a racist or anti-semite. It'd be a waste of my time (in my individual opinion).

You're brainwashed.
Go and google who owns the US mass media before you start hurling stupid terms like racist and anti-semite.

0 Replies

Pete34 wrote:

I don't think I'm entitled to anything. I wonder where those objective rights would come from. Just curious.

DavidIg wrote:
Pete34 wrote:
Speaking of which ... anyone wanna explain this objective human rights business?

Are you suggesting that you don't believe you're entitled to the right to life, liberty, property and the "pursuit" of happiness?

Mate, if you don't think they exist, then let's meet up and I'll abduct you and you can become my slave.

0 Replies

That's why we have laws and I like all these ideas. I just doubt they have any basis beyond being enforced by law. You seem to think differently and I am curious why. :wink:

DavidIg wrote:

Pete34 wrote:
I don't think I'm entitled to anything. I wonder where those objective rights would come from. Just curious.

DavidIg wrote:
Pete34 wrote:
Speaking of which ... anyone wanna explain this objective human rights business?

Are you suggesting that you don't believe you're entitled to the right to life, liberty, property and the "pursuit" of happiness?

Mate, if you don't think they exist, then let's meet up and I'll abduct you and you can become my slave.

0 Replies

aidan : You're offensive David

Offensiveness is only offensive to the one being offended. Racist is only racist to the one being racist by putting the truth in the context of race. Semitic is a family of languages. David isn't anti-languages.

aidan : with a racist or anti-semite.

Only in the context of Judaism, where "one is born a Jew", is the idea that anti-Semitism is against an individual, because of their own belief in the concept of race.

The concept of race is false.

Aidan, Only a dumb head banging Jew can be offended by the truth, by being exposed for their criminal mentality.

http://www.individual-sovereignty.com/pic/HBJ.gif

0 Replies

Pete34 : I just doubt they have any basis beyond being enforced by law.

That is because you have the "might makes right", self-righteous sanctimonious bible thumping political whore sociopathic tyrant criminal mentality suffering from delusions of grandeur that would violate the individual rights and sovereignty of another.

0 Replies

Pete34 wrote:

That's why we have laws and I like all these ideas. I just doubt they have any basis beyond being enforced by law. You seem to think differently and I am curious why

Our IR's are objective, however, abiding by them is optional, although in your best interest.

A TV series called "Underbelly" was shown this year on Australian TV, it's about the Melbourne gangwar 94-2004...most of the main crims are either dead, in jail, or in the court system.....not that the law stopped them from robbing and killing numerous people, many totally innocent.

In 1976, a group of 7 men pulled off the biggest robbery in Australia's history, they stole approx 3-5 million dollars, however, by 1983, 6 of the 7 were "murdered", and the other one lasted till 93 before being shot and killed by police.

When speaking about the making of "Goodfella's"....Joe Pesci said that the wiseguys had a lifecycle of about 9-10yrs.

Doesn't sound like that sort of crime pays.
Recognizing and abiding by our IR's are what ensures we're safe when the police aren't around.

0 Replies

DavidIg : Our IR's are objective, however, abiding by them is optional, although in your best interest.

And more importantly, at one's own demise.

One of the unintended consequences of "The Nuremberg trials", is that it taught us that a government and its leaders are held responsible for violating one's individual rights and individual sovereignty; and can not hide behind the mentality that "I was just doing my job". Because a crime against humanity is in the purview of individual rights and individual sovereignty, ANYONE can be brought before a Tribunal, which is a legitimate forum to bring indictments against the guilty parties, try them and if found guilty, execute for crimes against humanity.

0 Replies

Objectivism 101

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know