Objectivism 101

Maybe you weren't paying attention. Many on this thread have pointed out that your use of hate speech is wrong.

It's just another group of Jews....no progress can be made when you're dealing with such intellectual incompetents.
They probably think Bill O'reily's a cool dude.

You mean you hate us telling the truth about Jews?

Yeah thats right, we hate you telling the truth about Jews. :wink:

Anyway, Buddhist ethics farts in the face of any other ethical system you care to mention. Thats including your own ridiculous objectivism.

David and JJ, if you do reply please attempt to post a reply that does not use the word Jew. I want to see if any one of you are capable of doing such a thing.

I am a native of New York City, although if there were an afterlife, my Irish Catholic and Irish Protestant ancestors would be suffering torments of anguish to think that i had magically been transmogrified into a Jew.

Given that these two side-show clowns seem prepared to brand anyone and everyone who might disagree with them as a criminal Zionist Jew, does that mean they think the world population of Jews numbers in the billions? Or does it mean that they think the population of those who routinely post on internet fora are overwhelmingly Jews, saving only, of course, courageous stormtroopers such as themselves?

So many questions . . . so little reason to expect a coherent response from Frick and Frack here . . .

That would appear to be the message. Cultists all, thoughtless sheep, allowing ourselves to be brainwashed into the master plan.

Setanta,

Judaism is ONLY a dogma, that developed a system of political control using "GOD said" for ILLEGITIMATE individual domination.

When you spew the subjective morality of "GOD said", "King said", or "society said"; you are a Jew, spewing Jewish DOGSHIT!

Your denial only makes you a head banger that doesn't understand what you are, living in the twilight zone.

Come back to reality, head banger!

JPB,

If you can't articulate the objective basis for right from wrong, then it is you, that is the cultist criminal looking for a Messiah, living in an Alicia in Wonder Land.

You might run, but you will never hide from REALITY!

sweetheart, I have no need for objectivity, salvation, or redemption. Momma's definition of right and wrong was as black and white as could be - even within this gray world. There was nothing objective about it (and, trust me, she was in no way Jewish) but it was clean, simple and pure.

So, if your subjective morality of "GOD said", "King said", or "society said" is all inclusive then you've missed a Very Big Mark.

I don't believe in God but "God said" is more objective than "I said".

JPB : I have no need for objectivity, salvation, or redemption.

Of course you don't, that is why it is a psychopathic tyrant criminal mentality, that has no problem violating another's individual rights and sovereignty, with your might makes right, subjective morality.


Men are notorious for this "If I can't have you, no one will" patriartical mentality, when they kill or abuse their wife or ex.

you are a peach, JJ.

yep, that's me -- I go around violating another's individual rights and sovereignty regularly. Oh wait... let me guess, we're stuck on guilt by association right?

Oh yeah, I'm all over men abusing and killing their wives too. Good call.

Jews.

This is a philosophy thread in the philosophy section, and we've repeatedly asked you how you determine right from wrong, yet you all fail to answer......so it's quite obvious you guys either have no idea, or you're just playing dumb, and considering how simple IR's are, I'm thinking the latter.

There's nothing that JJ and I can do against the multitude of ignoramus and criminals, but we can shove the truth down your throat and watch you try and weasel your way out of it

DavidIg,

This is a philosophy thread in the philosophy section and you have repeatedly spewed hateful nonsense instead of talking philosophy.

Wrong bullshitter....I've spelt out some basic facts of Objectivism.
It's not my fault you're a Jew and a criminal.

Once more with feeling...."Wandeljew, how do you determine right from wrong in an objective manner?"

Right is the way Thalion posts about philosophy.

Wrong is the way DavidIg posts about philosophy.

(This can be objectively judged by reading how others respond to David's posts, as opposed to Thalion's posts.)

JPB : guilt by association right?


No, not at all. It is guilt by your own mentality, claiming right from wrong is subjectively established, whether it is "JPB said", "society said", "government said", "king said, or your sock puppet "god said", all equates to a violation of one's individual rights and sovereignty. No one died and made you god. The bottom line is, you are a head banger trying to play god.

You're a Jew who labels the truth about Jews as hateful.....yep, that's a great basis for rational discussion.
Who owns and controls the US mass media?

wandeljw,

Hate is an emotion that can only be expressed or felt by the person that is doing the hating.

If you think you can feel for someone else, you are truly a head banger!

Please come back to reality, before you have no sense left.

What kind of idiot argues that ethics are subjective, when it's quite obvious that all sane people{the only meaningful test subjects} agree both explicitly and implicitly that they don't want their IR's violated, IOW, they know what IR's are at some level, and don't want others to violate them because it's undesirable as referenced against the standard of life, ie, one must first choose life over death, of course, we typically consider those that commit suicide and who're self destructive as weak, losers, pathetic, insane.

These message board pseudo-philosophers argue about any and everything, but not only are they unaware of the solutions, they actively dispute them,…….can people really be that stupid?......I guess so, but what if they're Jews posing as typical American's….either way, they're actively or passively supporting criminality.

I'm intolerant of evil, religion and stupidity, however, most of these fake philosophers are in favour of religious tolerance, illegal immigration, and amazing feats of stupidity themselves, so I can't imagine they're too keen on those who've gone to the bother of properly analysing the issues…..that's right Jews and general idiots, both JJ and I are genuine truthseekers, yet we're written off as anti-semites/racist etc…..but what would you expect from those who passively endorse, if not actively promote subjective ethics aka might makes right{sociopathy}.