Again out of area or out of business
Quote:In the nineties Senator Richard Lugar made his seminal statement about NATO going either out of area or out of business. Lugar was totally right - then. NATO had to accept new commitments beyond its territory, proliferate stability, enforce peace and enable civic actors to engage in post-conflict peace building were it to sustain its legitimacy. NATO since then has been of vital importance with SFOR in Bosnia-Herzegovina, with KFOR in Kosovo and, most recently, with ISAF in Afghanistan.
I found another quotation in which "out of area or out of business" is quoted and explained.
So did Lugar wanted to say that Nato should go into a place which is not part of Nato and operate, or it should not exist at all?