0
   

ELECTING HELPLESSNESS ?

 
 
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2008 03:35 pm
Choosing to walk thru the world
in a state of defensive nakedness,
of conscious HELPLESSNESS,
is a variation on the theme of
playing Russian Roulette.

It leaves one 's survival simply to chance,
in the hope that no predator will see fit to strike.

That is an irresponsible and unhealthy state-of-mind.



David
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,524 • Replies: 28
No top replies

 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2008 03:40 pm
Russian election is not that bad
as in the case of USA's election sir.

Iraq's election is million times better than BUSH's election
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2008 03:48 pm
Ramafuchs wrote:
Russian election is not that bad
as in the case of USA's election sir.

Iraq's election is million times better than BUSH's election

Thank u for your contribution, Rama.

Tell me:
when the nazis invaded Russia in 1941,
shud the communists have elected to be HELPLESS,
adopting a non-violent philosophy like Gandhi and refused to use guns
against the Germans ?

Wud that have been better, in your opinion ?

Please enlighten me.




.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2008 03:52 pm
I was born in India.

Gandhi is my god without WMD.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2008 07:30 pm
Ramafuchs wrote:
I was born in India.

Gandhi is my god without WMD.

In your opinion,
wud the communists have been better off
if thay had applied a purely non-violent philosophy ( like Gandhi )
in 1941, when the nazis invaded ?
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2008 07:39 pm
S sir
Yes sir

Gandhi is a half naked Fakir .( Ask the Cigar smoking Chruchill)
His counterpart (HITLER)
is corporate supported compassionate ANIT COMMUNIST.
Karl Marx a fine jew like Jesus is anti Hitler.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2008 07:49 pm
Ramafuchs wrote:
S sir
Yes sir

Gandhi is a half naked Fakir .( Ask the Cigar smoking Chruchill)

That 's OK.
I 'll take your word for it, Rama.



Quote:

His counterpart (HITLER)
is corporate supported compassionate ANIT COMMUNIST.
Karl Marx a fine jew like Jesus is anti Hitler.

Yes, I too am very anti-Marx and anti-Hitler.
Thay were HORRIBLE and caused many unnecessary deaths.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2008 07:57 pm
Thanks.
Follow the footsepts of Gandhi .
I care a jot whether i get killed by a corporate sponsored terrorist or the embedded compassionate comrade without the basic decency.

For me 11th september is as worse as the crucification of Jesus.
I am an athiest
Regards.
Rama
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2008 10:20 pm
Ramafuchs wrote:
Thanks.
Follow the footsepts of Gandhi .
I care a jot whether i get killed by a corporate sponsored terrorist or the embedded compassionate comrade without the basic decency.

For me 11th september is as worse as the crucification of Jesus.
I am an athiest
Regards.
Rama

No.
I don 't think much of Gandhi.

Rama, do u believe that your comrade, Stalin,
shud have followed the footsteps of Gandhi in 1941
when the Germans invaded Russia ?

Please tell me your opinion.
Thank u.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2008 01:42 pm
I have no idea about any person who belittle the intellectual faculties of the normal humanbeings sir.
But I have my regards and respects for those who had risked their life to uplift humanity.
MLK
Mahathma Gandhi
Karl marx
Nelson mandela
Mother Theresa.

take your gun and shoot the innocents.
I am not with the aggressive two-legged consumers.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2008 02:32 am
Do u think that Stalin
shud have been NON-VIOLENT in 1941, Rama ?
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2008 02:27 pm
Yes sir.
Refer the history.(counterpart of Hitler whose name is Mahathma Gandhi)

Your projection of humanitarian help is n more valid.
We are decent with moral, civil courage.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2008 11:35 pm
Ramafuchs wrote:
Yes sir.
Refer the history.(counterpart of Hitler whose name is Mahathma Gandhi)

Your projection of humanitarian help is n more valid.
We are decent with moral, civil courage.

OK, then, Rama,
can we AGREE that when the nazis invaded,
the communists shud have been non-violent,
like Gandhi believed, and not resisted with any guns ?
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 04:44 pm
Omsig David
Dont put any quixotic question.
I know you are upholding your Gun and violenet politcs. and i haope you know me that I am not violent.
Come what may.
Death levels all

Rama
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 06:45 pm
Ramafuchs wrote:
Omsig David
Dont put any quixotic question.
I know you are upholding your Gun and violenet politcs. and i haope you know me that I am not violent.
Come what may.
Death levels all

Rama

Well, Rama,
I believe that when the nazis invaded Russia,
the communists shud have been peaceful and NON-violent,
the same as Gandhi and
the communists shud have accepted the national SOCIALISTS' invasion with love, peace, and flowers.
Do u AGREE, Rama ??
Can we agree on that ?


or

Do u believe that the communists shud have been VIOLENT, as thay actually were ?

Which way wud have been better, Rama ??
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 06:53 pm
Sorry David.
My views are shaped by
Mahathma Gandhi
Karl marx
MLK
Nelson madela
beside
Mother theresa.
Of course I will add your name in the above list.

You never know how much a person can not remember.
Am i wrong?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 07:19 pm
Ramafuchs wrote:
Sorry David.
My views are shaped by
Mahathma Gandhi
Karl marx
MLK
Nelson madela
beside
Mother theresa.
Of course I will add your name in the above list.

You never know how much a person can not remember.
Am i wrong?

Well, you are wrong IF U DISAGREE WITH GANDHI and his NON-violence.
I am saying that when the nazis invaded,
Stalin shud have done the same thing
that GANDHI did regarding the English.

I am saying that Stalin shud have been equally as NON-violent as Gandhi,
but it seems to me that u reject the pacifism of Gandhi
and that RAMA AGREES with the armed VIOLENCE of Stalin in 1941.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 07:30 pm
No Stalin is different.
Ask his daughter who had enjoyed her life in USA( I had not been there)

Karl Marx is one among the many idols of mine.
Taste differs.
Ask the neighbour who knows something about Trier or Karl Marx.

I will post a thread to uphold A2k's decency shortly.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 07:39 pm
Ramafuchs wrote:
No Stalin is different.

Different than WHAT ?

HOW was Stalin different ?






Quote:
Karl Marx is one among the many idols of mine.

When I was a child, I used to wish that
I were able to go back in time to the 1800s
with a submachinegun to kill Karl Marx
before he caused any trouble.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 07:42 pm
Sorry Omsig David.
I feel sorry for my ignorance.
Is it ok sir?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » ELECTING HELPLESSNESS ?
Copyright © 2023 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/04/2023 at 07:05:52